Hello!
> This has been this way forever, it is thus an API and it is not
> changing. Changing it would break existing programs. End of story.
8) However, imagine, freebsd folks changed this in their release 2.x.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Date:Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:01:25 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BUG DESCRIPTION:
(This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well).
The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through an
accept(2) call, in spite of what
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Matthias Andree wrote:
> BUG DESCRIPTION:
> (This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well).
> The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through an
> accept(2) call, in spite of what socket(7) documents. This is a bug.
> accept(2) must copy
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 05:54:14AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:01:25 +0200
>From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> (This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well).
> The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:01:25 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well).
The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through an
accept(2) call, in spite of what socket(7) documents. This is a
Please mind the To: and Cc: headers. If there are relevant followups,
please send me a Cc: as I'm only subscribed to the linux-kernel and dns
mailing lists.
In some debugging, Pavel Kankovsky and Daniel J. Bernstein have tracked
down a Linux Kernel bug that I can confirm for 2.2.17 and
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:01:25 +0200
From: Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well).
The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through an
accept(2) call, in spite of what socket(7) documents. This is a bug.
Hello!
This has been this way forever, it is thus an API and it is not
changing. Changing it would break existing programs. End of story.
8) However, imagine, freebsd folks changed this in their release 2.x.
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 05:54:14AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:01:25 +0200
From: Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well).
The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through an
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Matthias Andree wrote:
BUG DESCRIPTION:
(This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well).
The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through an
accept(2) call, in spite of what socket(7) documents. This is a bug.
accept(2) must copy the
Date:Fri, 15 Sep 2000 15:01:25 +0200
From: Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BUG DESCRIPTION:
(This is for IPv4, someone would have to check IPv6 as well).
The socket flag O_NONBLOCK is _NOT_ properly inherited through an
accept(2) call, in spite of what socket(7)
Please mind the To: and Cc: headers. If there are relevant followups,
please send me a Cc: as I'm only subscribed to the linux-kernel and dns
mailing lists.
In some debugging, Pavel Kankovsky and Daniel J. Bernstein have tracked
down a Linux Kernel bug that I can confirm for 2.2.17 and
12 matches
Mail list logo
