Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-04-04 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:18:24AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 22:02 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > These need to be put back. Moving them to GPL -- but in a measured > > manner, as I proposed on this list some months ago -- is fine. Changing > > these

Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-04-04 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 22:02 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > These need to be put back. Moving them to GPL -- but in a measured > manner, as I proposed on this list some months ago -- is fine. Changing > these particular exports precipitously is most definitely -not- fine. > Here is my earlier

Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-04-04 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:18:24AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 22:02 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: These need to be put back. Moving them to GPL -- but in a measured manner, as I proposed on this list some months ago -- is fine. Changing these particular

Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-04-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Due to the patent situation at least in the USA, the exports of > kernel/rcupdate.c should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Based on -what- line of reasoning??? The obvious ones do not apply to this situation. These need to be put back.

Re: [2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-04-02 Thread Paul E. McKenney
On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: Due to the patent situation at least in the USA, the exports of kernel/rcupdate.c should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Based on -what- line of reasoning??? The obvious ones do not apply to this situation. These need to be put back. Moving

[2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-03-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Due to the patent situation at least in the USA, the exports of kernel/rcupdate.c should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This patch was already sent on: - 3 Mar 2005 --- linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1-full/kernel/rcupdate.c.old 2005-03-02 16:11:15.0

[2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-03-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Due to the patent situation at least in the USA, the exports of kernel/rcupdate.c should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This patch was already sent on: - 3 Mar 2005 --- linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1-full/kernel/rcupdate.c.old 2005-03-02 16:11:15.0

[2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-03-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
Due to the patet situation at least in the USA, the exports of kernel/rcupdate.c should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1-full/kernel/rcupdate.c.old 2005-03-02 16:11:15.0 +0100 +++

[2.6 patch] kernel/rcupdate.c: make the exports EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL

2005-03-03 Thread Adrian Bunk
Due to the patet situation at least in the USA, the exports of kernel/rcupdate.c should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1-full/kernel/rcupdate.c.old 2005-03-02 16:11:15.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1-full/kernel/rcupdate.c