Re: [2.6 patch] sparc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

2005-09-02 Thread David S. Miller
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:24:44 +0200 > "extern inline" doesn't make much sense. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch does not apply to Linus's current tree, every change in include/asm-sparc/spinlock.h was rejected. - To unsubscribe from

[2.6 patch] sparc: "extern inline" -> "static inline"

2005-09-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
"extern inline" doesn't make much sense. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/sparc/kernel/time.c |2 +- arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c |2 +- include/asm-sparc/btfixup.h | 12 ++-- include/asm-sparc/cache.h | 18 +-

[2.6 patch] sparc: extern inline - static inline

2005-09-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
extern inline doesn't make much sense. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- arch/sparc/kernel/time.c |2 +- arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c |2 +- include/asm-sparc/btfixup.h | 12 ++-- include/asm-sparc/cache.h | 18 +-

Re: [2.6 patch] sparc: extern inline - static inline

2005-09-02 Thread David S. Miller
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 22:24:44 +0200 extern inline doesn't make much sense. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patch does not apply to Linus's current tree, every change in include/asm-sparc/spinlock.h was rejected. - To unsubscribe from this