Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07.02.2008 23:17:12:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
> What is it? It has to live on some kind of bus, right?
It is a piece of hardware with a firmware/hypervisor abstraction layer on
top.
The hypervisor provides
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07.02.2008 23:17:12:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
What is it? It has to live on some kind of bus, right?
It is a piece of hardware with a firmware/hypervisor abstraction layer on
top.
The hypervisor provides
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29.01.2008 14:23:09:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> ...
> > > The sym-link is not gereated automatically as the device for portX is
> added
> > > to
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Christoph Raisch wrote:
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29.01.2008 14:23:09:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
...
The sym-link is not gereated automatically as the device for portX is
added
to the eHEA
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 15:20, Christoph Raisch wrote:
> These pci functions corresponds to a
> /sys/bus/ibmebus/devices/789D.001.XX-P1/port0
> and
> /sys/bus/ibmebus/devices/789D.001.XX-P1/port1
>
> The busdriver currently does not find out, how many ports are in a
>
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29.01.2008 14:23:09:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
...
> > The sym-link is not gereated automatically as the device for portX is
added
> > to the eHEA device (as subnode) where the eHEA device is not a bus.
>
> Then
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2008 20:22, you wrote:
> > Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is now broken in mainline...
> > > >
> > >
On Monday 28 January 2008 20:22, you wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > >
> > > This is now broken in mainline...
> > >
> > > drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function 'ehea_driver_sysfs_add':
> > >
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 29.01.2008 14:23:09:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
...
The sym-link is not gereated automatically as the device for portX is
added
to the eHEA device (as subnode) where the eHEA device is not a bus.
Then please fix
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:12:40AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008 20:22, you wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
This is now broken in mainline...
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:22:04PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > The structure device_driver(in device.h)
Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
> > > > > driver_private which
> > > > > contains the
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:16:48AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
>
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
> > > driver_private
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
> >
> > On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
> >
> > On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:16:48AM +0100, Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
Hi,
sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
driver_private which
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:22:04PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
driver_private which
contains the member kobj (according to
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
Hi,
sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:10:48PM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
Hi,
sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
>
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
> > > driver_private which
> > > contains the member kobj
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
Hi,
sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct
driver_private which
contains the member kobj (according to
Hi,
sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
> > The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct driver_private
> > which
> > contains the member kobj (according to drivers/base/base.h).
> > But in
Hi,
sorry for answering so late, I'm only tracking netdev and ppc mailing list.
On Thursday 10 January 2008 18:34, Greg KH wrote:
The structure device_driver(in device.h) has a member struct driver_private
which
contains the member kobj (according to drivers/base/base.h).
But in
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:03:05PM +0530, Sudhir Kumar wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Kernel build fails on my machine with error :
>
>
> LD drivers/net/ehea/built-in.o
> CC [M] drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.o
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function ???ehea_driver_sysfs_add???:
>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:03:05PM +0530, Sudhir Kumar wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Kernel build fails on my machine with error :
LD drivers/net/ehea/built-in.o
CC [M] drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.o
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function ???ehea_driver_sysfs_add???:
Hi Andrew,
Kernel build fails on my machine with error :
LD drivers/net/ehea/built-in.o
CC [M] drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.o
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function ‘ehea_driver_sysfs_add’:
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:2812: error: ‘struct device_driver’ has no
member named ‘kobj’
Hi Andrew,
Kernel build fails on my machine with error :
LD drivers/net/ehea/built-in.o
CC [M] drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.o
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c: In function ‘ehea_driver_sysfs_add’:
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c:2812: error: ‘struct device_driver’ has no
member named ‘kobj’
28 matches
Mail list logo
