Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-14 Thread Mathieu Bérard
Tejun Heo a écrit : > Hello, > > > Due to blacklisting, NCQ > won't be turned on your drive in future kernels. > > Hello thanks. I have found on Hitachi website the technical datasheets of my drive model:

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-14 Thread Mathieu Bérard
Tejun Heo a écrit : Hello, Due to blacklisting, NCQ won't be turned on your drive in future kernels. Hello thanks. I have found on Hitachi website the technical datasheets of my drive model:

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-13 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Mathieu Bérard wrote: > [ 15.031823] ata1.00: taskfile_load_raw: (0x1f1-1f7): hex: 10 03 00 00 > 00 a0 ef Okay, this is interesting. This is Enable Device-Initiated Interface Power State Transitions. So, after this command is executed the device will try to transit to partial/slumber

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-13 Thread Mathieu Bérard
Tejun Heo a écrit : > Can you apply the attached patch and report what the kernel says with > ACPI turned on? > > Hi, I got this: [ 13.523816] SCSI subsystem initialized [ 13.528914] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[B] -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19 [ 14.529383] ahci :00:1f.2: AHCI

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-13 Thread Mathieu Bérard
Tejun Heo a écrit : > > Mathieu Bérard wrote: >> >> Jeff Garzik a écrit : >>> >>> Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-13 Thread Tejun Heo
Can you apply the attached patch and report what the kernel says with ACPI turned on? -- tejun diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c index 019d8ff..6a27a7f 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c @@ -473,8 +473,8 @@ static void

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-13 Thread Tejun Heo
Can you apply the attached patch and report what the kernel says with ACPI turned on? -- tejun diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c index 019d8ff..6a27a7f 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c @@ -473,8 +473,8 @@ static void

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-13 Thread Mathieu Bérard
Tejun Heo a écrit : Mathieu Bérard wrote: Jeff Garzik a écrit : Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 Submitter : Mathieu Bérard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown according to the last message in

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-13 Thread Mathieu Bérard
Tejun Heo a écrit : Can you apply the attached patch and report what the kernel says with ACPI turned on? Hi, I got this: [ 13.523816] SCSI subsystem initialized [ 13.528914] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[B] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 14.529383] ahci :00:1f.2: AHCI

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-13 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Mathieu Bérard wrote: [ 15.031823] ata1.00: taskfile_load_raw: (0x1f1-1f7): hex: 10 03 00 00 00 a0 ef Okay, this is interesting. This is Enable Device-Initiated Interface Power State Transitions. So, after this command is executed the device will try to transit to partial/slumber

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-12 Thread Tejun Heo
Mathieu Bérard wrote: > Jeff Garzik a écrit : >> Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive >>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 >>> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Status : unknown >> according to the last message in that

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-12 Thread Tejun Heo
Mathieu Bérard wrote: Jeff Garzik a écrit : Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 Submitter : Mathieu Bérard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown according to the last message in that thread, it sounds like

Re: and try remove another quirk on this computers Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-10 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 21:41 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > > With this quirk I got this oops on hibernate (but computer still > > working) > > Well, strictly speaking it's a warning, not an oops per se. > > What happens is that the

Re: and try remove another quirk on this computers Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-10 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 21:41 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: With this quirk I got this oops on hibernate (but computer still working) Well, strictly speaking it's a warning, not an oops per se. What happens is that the quirk wants to

Re: and try remove another quirk on this computers Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > With this quirk I got this oops on hibernate (but computer still > working) Well, strictly speaking it's a warning, not an oops per se. What happens is that the quirk wants to do an "ioremap_nocache()", which allocates memory, and that

and try remove another quirk on this computers Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-09 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 02:09 +0100, Mathieu Bérard wrote: > Jeff Garzik a écrit : > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive > >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 > >> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Status : unknown > > >

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-09 Thread Mathieu Bérard
Jeff Garzik a écrit : > Adrian Bunk wrote: >> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 >> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Status : unknown > > according to the last message in that thread, it sounds like ACPI and

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-09 Thread Mathieu Bérard
Jeff Garzik a écrit : Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 Submitter : Mathieu Bérard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown according to the last message in that thread, it sounds like ACPI and interrupt

and try remove another quirk on this computers Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-09 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 02:09 +0100, Mathieu Bérard wrote: Jeff Garzik a écrit : Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 Submitter : Mathieu Bérard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown according to the

Re: and try remove another quirk on this computers Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-09 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: With this quirk I got this oops on hibernate (but computer still working) Well, strictly speaking it's a warning, not an oops per se. What happens is that the quirk wants to do an ioremap_nocache(), which allocates memory, and that

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Status : unknown according to the last message in that thread, it sounds like ACPI and interrupt problems Subject:

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178 Submitter : Mathieu Bérard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status : unknown according to the last message in that thread, it sounds like ACPI and interrupt problems Subject:

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-06 Thread Alan Cox
> Subject: libata: PATA UDMA/100 configured as UDMA/33 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/20/294 > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg04115.html > Submitter : Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-06 Thread Alan Cox
Subject: libata: PATA UDMA/100 configured as UDMA/33 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/20/294 http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg04115.html Submitter : Fabio Comolli [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Status :

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-04 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:50:36AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > Subject: kernels fail to boot with drives on ATIIXP controller > References :

[3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm

[3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch of you caused a breakage or I'm

Re: [3/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-04 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:50:36AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. Subject: kernels fail to boot with drives on ATIIXP controller References :