On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:44:05AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Divorce IRQ stack configuration from CONFIG_4KSTACKS, as it's believed to
>> be an important safety measure regardless of stack size by some users.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 07:11:24PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:44:05AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:38:19AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > Here's what I did for i386 for someone concerned about blowing the stack.
>
> Divorce IRQ stack configuration from CONFIG_4KSTACKS, as it's believed
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:38:19AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Here's what I did for i386 for someone concerned about blowing the stack.
Divorce IRQ stack configuration from CONFIG_4KSTACKS, as it's believed to
be an important safety measure regardless of stack size by some users.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:38:19AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Here's what I did for i386 for someone concerned about blowing the stack.
Divorce IRQ stack configuration from CONFIG_4KSTACKS, as it's believed to
be an important safety measure regardless of stack size by some users.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:44:05AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:38:19AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Here's what I did for i386 for someone concerned about blowing the stack.
Divorce IRQ stack configuration from CONFIG_4KSTACKS, as it's believed to
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:44:05AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
Divorce IRQ stack configuration from CONFIG_4KSTACKS, as it's believed to
be an important safety measure regardless of stack size by some users.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 07:11:24PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
We should
6 matches
Mail list logo