On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:39 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> What do you mean "adds another incompatibility" ?
>
> That users will have to switch to dmraid when upgrading to v2.6.x ?
which is a rather disruptive and incompatible change. device names
change etc etc.
> SATA is not the same case
Hi Bart,
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:28:04AM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > [ This mail is just to explain why I don't like iswraid,
> > > I don't care if it gets merged that much... ]
> > >
> > > another BTW: this driver adds another incompatibility between
> > > 2.4.x and 2.6.x
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:39:34 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:04:09PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:04:09PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:05:13 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>A
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:35:23 -0500, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >>
> I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since oth
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:49:33PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> > user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
>
> the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
> patches. And for new DRM (
Martins Krikis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do realize that Intel should have asked a long time ago for it
> to be considered for acceptance (I did ask back in October for
> 2.4.28).
Sorry about all the noise, but I just remembered some other important
aspects that played a role here.
Intel c
--- Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since
> otherwise
> > user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
>
> the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
> patches. And for new DRM (since new X ma
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:09:37AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I'm talking about being able to access data, or not.
And your point is?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:03:27AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Red herring.
2.4.x has ICH5/6 support -- but is missing the RAID support component.
We are talking about hardware that is ALREADY supported by 2.4.x kernel,
not new hardware.
You're talking about software not su
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 10:03:27AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Red herring.
>
> 2.4.x has ICH5/6 support -- but is missing the RAID support component.
>
> We are talking about hardware that is ALREADY supported by 2.4.x kernel,
> not new hardware.
You're talking about software not support (the
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 10:03 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >>I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> >>user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
> >
> >
> > the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
> > patc
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:03:27 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >>I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> >>user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
> >
> >
> > the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardwar
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for new DRM (since new X may need it) and new .. and
new ... where is th
> I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
the same is true for all new hardware drivers and hardware support
patches. And for new DRM (since new X may need it) and new .. and
new ... where is the line?
for me a d
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 09:38:54AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Without device mapper (another new feature) to enable dmraid, these
> users are just sorta S.O.L.
>
> I consider it not a new feature, but a missing feature, since otherwise
> user data cannot be accessed in the RAID setups.
So thos
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:27:56 +0100, Arjan van de Ven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Martins Krikis wrote:
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
http:/
On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:27:56 +0100, Arjan van de Ven
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Martins Krikis wrote:
> > > Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
> > > available for the 2.4 series kernels at
> > > http://prdownlo
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:36 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Martins Krikis wrote:
> > Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
> > available for the 2.4 series kernels at
> > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
>
> ACK from me
personally
Martins Krikis wrote:
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
ACK from me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
Version 0.1.5 of the Intel Sofware RAID driver (iswraid) is now
available for the 2.4 series kernels at
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/iswraid/2.4.29-iswraid.patch.gz?download
It is an ataraid "subdriver" but uses the SCSI subsystem to find the
RAID member disks. It depends on the libata libra
23 matches
Mail list logo
