* Paul Gortmaker | 2013-08-02 10:19:36 [-0400]:
>The list of donor victims that aren't used in asm is getting
>smaller, but TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG seems OK and it puts RESCHED
>and RESCHED_LAZY right beside each other.
Applied & merged into the original patch. Thanks.
>Thanks guys,
>Paul.
* Paul Gortmaker | 2013-08-02 10:19:36 [-0400]:
The list of donor victims that aren't used in asm is getting
smaller, but TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG seems OK and it puts RESCHED
and RESCHED_LAZY right beside each other.
Applied merged into the original patch. Thanks.
Thanks guys,
Paul.
Sebastian
--
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 10:19 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
> Yep, 3.8 shuffled TIF_MEMDIE to the end of the queue, but
> in 3.10, mainline commit 22ecbe8dcef has already done that trick.
>
> The list of donor victims that aren't used in asm is getting
> smaller, but TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG seems OK
[Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1] On 02/08/2013 (Fri 14:45) Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> On 08/02/2013 07:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >> I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on
> >>
On 08/02/2013 07:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on
>> how best to fix this, even though it is not yet mainline.
>
> Can you exchange with a TIF_ that isn't used in asm ? For
On 08/02/2013 07:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on
how best to fix this, even though it is not yet mainline.
Can you exchange with a TIF_ that isn't used in asm ? For example
[Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1] On 02/08/2013 (Fri 14:45) Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
On 08/02/2013 07:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on
how best to fix this, even though
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 10:19 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Yep, 3.8 shuffled TIF_MEMDIE to the end of the queue, but
in 3.10, mainline commit 22ecbe8dcef has already done that trick.
The list of donor victims that aren't used in asm is getting
smaller, but TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG seems OK and it
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on
> how best to fix this, even though it is not yet mainline.
Can you exchange with a TIF_ that isn't used in asm ? For example
TIF_PERFMON_* ? Keep all the asm ones below 16 and move
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Dear RT folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set.
>
> This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had
> experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it
> into a shape which would have made
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:24:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Dear RT folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set.
>
> This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had
> experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it
> into a shape which
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set.
This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had
experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it
into a shape which would have made it applicable to RT.
Known issues:
- SLAB support not
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set.
This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had
experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it
into a shape which would have made it applicable to RT.
Known issues:
- SLAB support not
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:24:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set.
This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had
experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it
into a shape which would
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote:
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set.
This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had
experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it
into a shape which
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on
how best to fix this, even though it is not yet mainline.
Can you exchange with a TIF_ that isn't used in asm ? For example
TIF_PERFMON_* ? Keep all the asm ones below 16 and move up
16 matches
Mail list logo
