Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread Andreas Ericsson
Junio C Hamano wrote: Assuming that we do not give the old git-p4import script packaged in "git-p4 package", would the following patch be all that is needed, or do we need other things in the spec file? -- snipsnap clipcrap -- +Obsoletes: git-p4 That depends. If packages outside of git

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Junio C Hamano wrote: "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sean wrote: Given the comment from David, I suspect your patch is all that's needed; hopefully Peter can give it a quick test. It sounds like it; I don't know how to test it other than placing in the repository and try to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sean wrote: >> >> Given the comment from David, I suspect your patch is all >> that's needed; hopefully Peter can give it a quick test. > > It sounds like it; I don't know how to test it other than placing in > the repository and try to upgrade. It

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Sean wrote: Given the comment from David, I suspect your patch is all that's needed; hopefully Peter can give it a quick test. It sounds like it; I don't know how to test it other than placing in the repository and try to upgrade. It can't be any worse, so I don't see any harm in just

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Sean wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:57:03 +0100 "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From the looks of it, there is still a git-p4, it just moved to contrib and uses fast-import, so removing its rpm package was probably broken in the first place. Hi Peter, Items in contrib aren't

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Sean wrote: On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:57:03 +0100 H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the looks of it, there is still a git-p4, it just moved to contrib and uses fast-import, so removing its rpm package was probably broken in the first place. Hi Peter, Items in contrib aren't

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Sean wrote: Given the comment from David, I suspect your patch is all that's needed; hopefully Peter can give it a quick test. It sounds like it; I don't know how to test it other than placing in the repository and try to upgrade. It can't be any worse, so I don't see any harm in just

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sean wrote: Given the comment from David, I suspect your patch is all that's needed; hopefully Peter can give it a quick test. It sounds like it; I don't know how to test it other than placing in the repository and try to upgrade. It can't be any

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Junio C Hamano wrote: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sean wrote: Given the comment from David, I suspect your patch is all that's needed; hopefully Peter can give it a quick test. It sounds like it; I don't know how to test it other than placing in the repository and try to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-03 Thread Andreas Ericsson
Junio C Hamano wrote: Assuming that we do not give the old git-p4import script packaged in git-p4 package, would the following patch be all that is needed, or do we need other things in the spec file? -- snipsnap clipcrap -- +Obsoletes: git-p4 That depends. If packages outside of git

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:13:09 -0700 > Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... >> For majority of general public, I thought the spec file _I_ >> ship, along with RPM files _I_ build, are contrib status >> already. Don't distro people do their own RPM

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Sean
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:13:09 -0700 Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Junio, > For majority of general public, I thought the spec file _I_ > ship, along with RPM files _I_ build, are contrib status > already. Don't distro people do their own RPM packages, instead > of using what I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:57:03 +0100 > "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From the looks of it, there is still a git-p4, it just moved to contrib >> and uses fast-import, so removing its rpm package was probably broken in >> the first place. > ...

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Sean
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:57:03 +0100 "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From the looks of it, there is still a git-p4, it just moved to contrib > and uses fast-import, so removing its rpm package was probably broken in > the first place. Hi Peter, Items in contrib aren't officially

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Alex Riesen
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz, Sun, Sep 02, 2007 10:43:38 +0200: > *** t0001-init.sh *** > * FAIL 1: plain > > ( > unset GIT_DIR GIT_WORK_TREE && > mkdir plain && > cd plain && > git init >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread H. Peter Anvin
David Kastrup wrote: "H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Junio C Hamano wrote: * For people who need to import from Perforce, a front-end for fast-import is in contrib/fast-import/. There seems to be an issue with this and RPMS. In particular, there is no longer a git-p4 RPMS,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread David Kastrup
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> * For people who need to import from Perforce, a front-end for >> fast-import is in contrib/fast-import/. >> > > There seems to be an issue with this and RPMS. > > In particular, there is no longer a git-p4 RPMS, which

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> * For people who need to import from Perforce, a front-end for >> fast-import is in contrib/fast-import/. > > There seems to be an issue with this and RPMS. > > In particular, there is no longer a git-p4 RPMS, which

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Junio C Hamano wrote: * For people who need to import from Perforce, a front-end for fast-import is in contrib/fast-import/. There seems to be an issue with this and RPMS. In particular, there is no longer a git-p4 RPMS, which prevents git from getting upgraded at all by yum. Anyone

[ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
The latest feature release GIT 1.5.3 is available at the usual places: http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/ git-1.5.3.tar.{gz,bz2}(tarball) git-htmldocs-1.5.3.tar.{gz,bz2} (preformatted docs) git-manpages-1.5.3.tar.{gz,bz2}

[ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
The latest feature release GIT 1.5.3 is available at the usual places: http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/ git-1.5.3.tar.{gz,bz2}(tarball) git-htmldocs-1.5.3.tar.{gz,bz2} (preformatted docs) git-manpages-1.5.3.tar.{gz,bz2}

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Junio C Hamano wrote: * For people who need to import from Perforce, a front-end for fast-import is in contrib/fast-import/. There seems to be an issue with this and RPMS. In particular, there is no longer a git-p4 RPMS, which prevents git from getting upgraded at all by yum. Anyone

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Junio C Hamano wrote: * For people who need to import from Perforce, a front-end for fast-import is in contrib/fast-import/. There seems to be an issue with this and RPMS. In particular, there is no longer a git-p4 RPMS, which prevents git from

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread David Kastrup
H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Junio C Hamano wrote: * For people who need to import from Perforce, a front-end for fast-import is in contrib/fast-import/. There seems to be an issue with this and RPMS. In particular, there is no longer a git-p4 RPMS, which prevents git from

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Sean
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:57:03 +0100 H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the looks of it, there is still a git-p4, it just moved to contrib and uses fast-import, so removing its rpm package was probably broken in the first place. Hi Peter, Items in contrib aren't officially

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:57:03 +0100 H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From the looks of it, there is still a git-p4, it just moved to contrib and uses fast-import, so removing its rpm package was probably broken in the first place. ... As an aside,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Sean
On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:13:09 -0700 Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Junio, For majority of general public, I thought the spec file _I_ ship, along with RPM files _I_ build, are contrib status already. Don't distro people do their own RPM packages, instead of using what I placed on

Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.3

2007-09-02 Thread Junio C Hamano
Sean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:13:09 -0700 Junio C Hamano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... For majority of general public, I thought the spec file _I_ ship, along with RPM files _I_ build, are contrib status already. Don't distro people do their own RPM packages, instead