On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:28:32 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thanks for your comments;
You're welcome.
> the attached probably needs proofreading.
In general, I like it. The git-branch documentation already talks
about "remote-tracking branches" so I've rewritten a couple of
sentence below to use
Thanks for your comments; the attached probably needs
proofreading.
The changes in response to the remainder of your comments are
quite straightforward and I do not think needs proofreading, so
I'll incorporate them and push the result out in 'todo'.
diff --git a/v1.5.0.txt b/v1.5.0.txt
index c0f
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> GIT v1.5.0 Release Notes (draft)
>
Would they be somewhere besides todo branch of git.git repository, like the
v1.5.0 tag comment (content), or the NEWS file?
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:20:06 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Also, in the same spirit of giving the release an early
> exposure, here is the current draft of 1.5.0 release notes.
Thanks, these are very good and really show how much great progress
has gone into git recently. Congratulations to every
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> In general, though, I would agree that the major number should change if there
> is an incompatible change.
Maybe when those incompatible features are enabled by default. Right
now they're not.
Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
"Horst H. von Brand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Anything you can do to make tester's life easier will always slightly
>> > increase the number of testers.
>> > ...
>> > Pre-release tar.gz and rpms couple
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> * Reflog
>>
>> - Reflog records the history of where the tip of each branch
>>was at each moment.
>
> It might make sense to reformulate that:
>
> Reflog records the history from the view point of the local
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Bill Lear wrote:
>>>
Also (apologies for the ignorance), how do I get the 1.5.0-rc2 release?
>>>
>>> Direct your browser to
>>>
>>> http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=sn
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Bill Lear wrote:
> >
> >> Also (apologies for the ignorance), how do I get the 1.5.0-rc2 release?
> >
> > Direct your browser to
> >
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=snapshot;h=eaf6459e4d48
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> - 'git pack-refs' appeared in v1.4.4;
You should probably mention that it is not necessary to run git-pack-refs
by hand: git-gc is what you want.
BTW have I praised y'all for inventing git-gc? It is _awesome_. I think I
will turn into a DWIM g
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Bill Lear wrote:
>
>> Also (apologies for the ignorance), how do I get the 1.5.0-rc2 release?
>
> Direct your browser to
>
> http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=snapshot;h=eaf6459e4d482af51429f9464125621b805eb5f
Better URL is
http://repo.or.cz/w/g
Hi,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Bill Lear wrote:
> Also (apologies for the ignorance), how do I get the 1.5.0-rc2 release?
Direct your browser to
http://repo.or.cz/w/git.git?a=snapshot;h=eaf6459e4d482af51429f9464125621b805eb5f
BTW please don't top post. It uses bandwidth unnecessarily (both in terms
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
> surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
> git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
> would help people to try out and find wrinkles before
Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anything you can do to make tester's life easier will always slightly
> > increase the number of testers.
> > ...
> > Pre-release tar.gz and rpms coupled with a freshmeat announcement should
> > get you a bunc
Junio C Hamano wrote:
One worry I had about releasing git-1.5.0-rc2-1.rpm and friends
just like the "official" ones was that people might have scripts
to automate downloading & updating of packages, and they may not
like to get "beta" installed for them.
I wonder if kernel.org machines are also
Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anything you can do to make tester's life easier will always slightly
> increase the number of testers.
> ...
> Pre-release tar.gz and rpms coupled with a freshmeat announcement should
> get you a bunch of testers and newcomers. This will give the new do
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 03:20:06AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
>> surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
>> git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
>> woul
On Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 03:20:06 (-0800) Junio C Hamano writes:
>BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
>surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
>git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
>would help people to try out
Also (apologies for the ignorance), how do I get the 1.5.0-rc2 release?
Bill
On Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 07:42:56 (-0600) Bill Lear writes:
>On Sunday, January 21, 2007 at 03:20:06 (-0800) Junio C Hamano writes:
>>BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
>>surface cha
Hi Junio !
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 03:20:06AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
> surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
> git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
> would help people to
BTW, as the upcoming v1.5.0 release will introduce quite a bit of
surface changes (although at the really core it still is the old
git and old ways should continue to work), I am wondering if it
would help people to try out and find wrinkles before the real
thing for me to cut a tarball and a set o
This hopefully is pretty much it for 1.5.0 modulo potential bugs
especially in newer topics. Aside from many bugfixes, changes
since -rc1 are:
- 'git log' is now reflog aware, and 'git show-branch' which
knew about reflog already has become much more useful with
reflogs.
- the porcelain/
22 matches
Mail list logo
