Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-29 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2014-01-29 20:52, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: >> Can you try this one: >> >> From e511789f7be00be0712910c60a57c51b2705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Tomi Valkeinen >> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:28:53 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] clkoutx2 fix >> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-29 Thread Ivaylo Dimitrov
On 29.01.2014 13:30, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 2014-01-28 20:17, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: On 28.01.2014 10:48, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: I made a somewhat hacky quickfix for beagle. Applying that and the clk-divider from the link above makes things work for me. However, as I said, the issue with

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-29 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2014-01-28 20:17, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > > > On 28.01.2014 10:48, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> I made a somewhat hacky quickfix for beagle. Applying that and the >> clk-divider from the link above makes things work for me. However, as I >> said, the issue with n900 might be different, but it'

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-29 Thread Tero Kristo
On 01/29/2014 11:38 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 2014-01-29 11:29, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: On 29.01.2014 11:10, Tero Kristo wrote: It looks like the omap36xx version of the omap96m_alwon_fck is modelled improperly in the dts files. I don't have access to omap36xx hardware myself, but give a

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-29 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2014-01-29 11:29, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > > > On 29.01.2014 11:10, Tero Kristo wrote: > >> >> It looks like the omap36xx version of the omap96m_alwon_fck is modelled >> improperly in the dts files. I don't have access to omap36xx hardware >> myself, but give a try for the following patch: >>

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-29 Thread Ivaylo Dimitrov
On 29.01.2014 11:10, Tero Kristo wrote: It looks like the omap36xx version of the omap96m_alwon_fck is modelled improperly in the dts files. I don't have access to omap36xx hardware myself, but give a try for the following patch: It could be that 36xx omap96m_alwon_fck clock is wrongly mo

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-29 Thread Tero Kristo
On 01/28/2014 08:17 PM, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: On 28.01.2014 10:48, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: I made a somewhat hacky quickfix for beagle. Applying that and the clk-divider from the link above makes things work for me. However, as I said, the issue with n900 might be different, but it'd be intere

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-28 Thread Ivaylo Dimitrov
On 28.01.2014 10:48, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: I made a somewhat hacky quickfix for beagle. Applying that and the clk-divider from the link above makes things work for me. However, as I said, the issue with n900 might be different, but it'd be interesting to hear if it has any effect. Tomi A

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-28 Thread Tero Kristo
On 01/28/2014 11:48 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 2014-01-28 11:35, Christoph Fritz wrote: On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 11:04 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On 2014-01-27 20:41, Christoph Fritz wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:30 +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: linux-next-20140124 DSS is broken on N900 -

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-28 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2014-01-28 11:35, Christoph Fritz wrote: > On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 11:04 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 2014-01-27 20:41, Christoph Fritz wrote: >>> On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:30 +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: linux-next-20140124 DSS is broken on N900 - display stays black (there is s

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-28 Thread Christoph Fritz
On Tue, 2014-01-28 at 11:04 +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2014-01-27 20:41, Christoph Fritz wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:30 +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > >> linux-next-20140124 DSS is broken on N900 - display stays black (there > >> is some noise though). I booted the kernel with qem

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-28 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2014-01-27 20:41, Christoph Fritz wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:30 +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: >> linux-next-20140124 DSS is broken on N900 - display stays black (there >> is some noise though). I booted the kernel with qemu and it gives the >> following warning: >> >> [0.623779] DS

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-28 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2014-01-28 09:50, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2014-01-27 19:30, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: >> Hi Tomi, >> >> linux-next-20140124 DSS is broken on N900 - display stays black (there >> is some noise though). I booted the kernel with qemu and it gives the >> following warning: >> >> [0.623779] DSS:

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-27 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On 2014-01-27 19:30, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > Hi Tomi, > > linux-next-20140124 DSS is broken on N900 - display stays black (there > is some noise though). I booted the kernel with qemu and it gives the > following warning: > > [0.623779] DSS: set fck to 17280 > [0.624237] ---

Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-27 Thread Christoph Fritz
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:30 +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > linux-next-20140124 DSS is broken on N900 - display stays black (there > is some noise though). I booted the kernel with qemu and it gives the > following warning: > > [0.623779] DSS: set fck to 17280 > [0.624237] -

[BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch

2014-01-27 Thread Ivaylo Dimitrov
Hi Tomi, linux-next-20140124 DSS is broken on N900 - display stays black (there is some noise though). I booted the kernel with qemu and it gives the following warning: [0.623779] DSS: set fck to 17280 [0.624237] [ cut here ] [0.624298] WARNING: CPU: 0