On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 12:54:11PM +0200, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Den 23-12-2018 kl. 01:28, skrev Linus Torvalds:
> > On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 3:07 PM Christian Brauner
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > However, for this case should I resend the revert?
> >
> > Since I was pointed at the original email
Den 23-12-2018 kl. 01:28, skrev Linus Torvalds:
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 3:07 PM Christian Brauner
wrote:
However, for this case should I resend the revert?
Since I was pointed at the original email thread, I just picked it up
from there directly. It still applied cleanly, nothing had
Hi,
I would like to thank you all for reacting to this issue so quickly, and
I am really sorry for sending the message several time. I thought there
was a problem with the way it was formatted or some such, hence why I
sent it several times, because none of the messages seemed to get through.
Am So., 23. Dez. 2018 um 00:02 Uhr schrieb Linus Torvalds
:
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 2:49 PM Christian Brauner
> wrote:
> >
> > To be fair, no one apart from me was pointing out that it actually
> > breaks people including systemd folks
> > even though I was bringing it up with them. I even
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 3:07 PM Christian Brauner
wrote:
>
> However, for this case should I resend the revert?
Since I was pointed at the original email thread, I just picked it up
from there directly. It still applied cleanly, nothing had changed in
that area.
Linus
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 12:02 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 2:49 PM Christian Brauner
> wrote:
> >
> > To be fair, no one apart from me was pointing out that it actually
> > breaks people including systemd folks
> > even though I was bringing it up with them. I even tried
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 2:49 PM Christian Brauner
wrote:
>
> To be fair, no one apart from me was pointing out that it actually
> breaks people including systemd folks
> even though I was bringing it up with them. I even tried to fix all of
> userspace after this got NACKED
Seriously, the "we
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 11:20 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> Eric, this is entirely unacceptable.
i would like to point out that I send a revert for this in *July*
before any kernel with this change
was released for the exact same reason. But I was ignored and no one
came to argumentative aid:
-
Eric, this is entirely unacceptable.
On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 12:58 PM Gabriel C wrote:
>
> Added some people to CC that might want to see this..
Thanks.
> > Here's an email that was sent to lkml about the subject:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/5/742
> >
> > I link also this, quoting the
Added some people to CC that might want to see this..
Am Sa., 22. Dez. 2018 um 19:14 Uhr schrieb Ellie Reeves :
>
> Hi,
> first off, allow me to express that this is my first time ever writing
> on such a mailing list, and that if something is unclear or you would
> need more information, just
Hi,
first off, allow me to express that this is my first time ever writing
on such a mailing list, and that if something is unclear or you would
need more information, just let me know.
I write to this list in hoping to see this change reverted. The linux
kernel always said it would avoid
Hi,
first off, allow me to express that this is my first time ever writing
on such a mailing list, and that if something is unclear or you would
need more information, just let me know.
I write to this list in hoping to see this change reverted. The linux
kernel always said it would avoid
Hi,
first off, allow me to express that this is my first time ever writing
on such a mailing list, and that if something is unclear or you would
need more information, just let me know.
I write to this list in hoping to see this change reverted. The linux
kernel always said it would avoid
13 matches
Mail list logo
