Hi.
(2013/10/26 0:12), Eric Paris wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:36 +0900, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
>
>> systemd|auditd
>> ---+---
>> ...|
>> ->
Hi.
(2013/10/26 0:12), Eric Paris wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:36 +0900, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
systemd|auditd
---+---
...|
-
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:36 +0900, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
> systemd|auditd
> ---+---
> ...|
> -> audit_receive |...
>
On Fri, 2013-10-25 at 10:36 +0900, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
systemd|auditd
---+---
...|
- audit_receive |...
-
Hi.
Thanks for your interest.
(2013/10/24 4:55), Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> Hi Toshiyuki-san,
>
> Toshiuki and Gao,
>
>> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
>>> The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:55:37PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 03:55 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> >> Hi Toshiyuki-san,
> >
> > Toshiuki and Gao,
> >
> >> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
> >>> The backlog
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 01:55:37PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
On 10/24/2013 03:55 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
Hi Toshiyuki-san,
Toshiuki and Gao,
On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
The backlog cannot be consumed
Hi.
Thanks for your interest.
(2013/10/24 4:55), Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
Hi Toshiyuki-san,
Toshiuki and Gao,
On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on
On 10/24/2013 03:55 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>> Hi Toshiyuki-san,
>
> Toshiuki and Gao,
>
>> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
>>> The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
>>> even if
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
> Hi Toshiyuki-san,
Toshiuki and Gao,
> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
> > The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
> > even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
> > The
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
Hi Toshiyuki-san,
Toshiuki and Gao,
On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
The
On 10/24/2013 03:55 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:30:34PM +0800, Gao feng wrote:
Hi Toshiyuki-san,
Toshiuki and Gao,
On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
even if
Hi Gao-san,
(2013/10/15 15:30), Gao feng wrote:
> Hi Toshiyuki-san,
> On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
>> The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
>> even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
>> The situation is a deadlock because
Hi Toshiyuki-san,
On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
> The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
> even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
> The situation is a deadlock because only auditd can consume the backlog.
> If the other
Hi Toshiyuki-san,
On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
The situation is a deadlock because only auditd can consume the backlog.
If the other process
Hi Gao-san,
(2013/10/15 15:30), Gao feng wrote:
Hi Toshiyuki-san,
On 10/15/2013 12:43 PM, Toshiyuki Okajima wrote:
The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
The situation is a deadlock because only
The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
The situation is a deadlock because only auditd can consume the backlog.
If the other process needs to send the backlog, it can be also stopped
by the deadlock.
The backlog cannot be consumed when audit_log_start is running on auditd
even if audit_log_start calls wait_for_auditd to consume it.
The situation is a deadlock because only auditd can consume the backlog.
If the other process needs to send the backlog, it can be also stopped
by the deadlock.
18 matches
Mail list logo