Hi,
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 23:35:12 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Sorry for the huge delay.
>
> On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 02:21:11 AM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > And from suspend_ioctls.h:
> > > > #define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC '3'
> > > > #define SNAPSHOT_FREEZE
Sorry for the huge delay.
On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 02:21:11 AM Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > And from suspend_ioctls.h:
> > > #define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC '3'
> > > #define SNAPSHOT_FREEZE _IO(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 1)
> > >
> > > My mistake, should be '3' instead of 3.
Hi!
> > And from suspend_ioctls.h:
> > #define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC '3'
> > #define SNAPSHOT_FREEZE _IO(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 1)
> >
> > My mistake, should be '3' instead of 3.
>
> OK... The thing to test, then, is what does __usermodehelper_disable()
> return to freeze_process
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 20:16:07 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:40:32PM +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> > And from suspend_ioctls.h:
> > #define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC '3'
> > #define SNAPSHOT_FREEZE _IO(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 1)
> >
> > My mistake, should be '3' i
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:40:32PM +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> And from suspend_ioctls.h:
> #define SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC '3'
> #define SNAPSHOT_FREEZE _IO(SNAPSHOT_IOC_MAGIC, 1)
>
> My mistake, should be '3' instead of 3.
OK... The thing to test, then, is what does __use
Hello,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 14:52:39 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:48:43AM +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > Additional (but probably useless) information on this bug may be found
> > > here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7371120.html
>
> Something's very fishy there
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:52:39PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:48:43AM +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > > Additional (but probably useless) information on this bug may be found
> > > here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7371120.html
>
> Something's very fishy there:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:48:43AM +0400, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> > Additional (but probably useless) information on this bug may be found
> > here: https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7371120.html
Something's very fishy there:
[quote]
Digging into suspend-utils code shows that the following
On Thu 2013-09-12 12:32:17, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:23:25 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 05, 2013 02:08:11 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Rafael, Al: apparently we have a regression caused by
> > > ba4df2808a86f8b103c4db
Hello,
On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 14:23:25 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 05, 2013 02:08:11 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Rafael, Al: apparently we have a regression caused by
> > ba4df2808a86f8b103c4db0b8807649383e9bd13 .
>
> I noticed that, but I'm not sure how to de
On Thursday, September 05, 2013 02:08:11 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Rafael, Al: apparently we have a regression caused by
> ba4df2808a86f8b103c4db0b8807649383e9bd13 .
I noticed that, but I'm not sure how to deal with it.
Also, s2disk still works on my test machines, so that seems to be
spe
Hi!
Rafael, Al: apparently we have a regression caused by
ba4df2808a86f8b103c4db0b8807649383e9bd13 .
> > after a kernel update from 3.5.7 to the latest stable I found that
> > user-space resume (from suspend-1.0 aka uswsusp) no longer works.
> > Kernel-space suspend and resume work fine (e.g. ech
Hello,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 23:44:15 +0400 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> after a kernel update from 3.5.7 to the latest stable I found that
> user-space resume (from suspend-1.0 aka uswsusp) no longer works.
> Kernel-space suspend and resume work fine (e.g. echo disk
> > /sys/power/state), problem is w
13 matches
Mail list logo