Hi again,
On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 10:52 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi Mimi,
>
> On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 10:40 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:50 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> >
> > > Well, there are at least two implementations I know of:
> > >
Hi Mimi,
On Fri, 2019-01-11 at 10:40 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:50 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
>
> > Well, there are at least two implementations I know of:
> > For my Lenovo X260 I can choose between Infineon TPM 1.2 or Intel PTT TPM
> > 2.0
> >
Hi Michael,
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:50 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Well, there are at least two implementations I know of:
> For my Lenovo X260 I can choose between Infineon TPM 1.2 or Intel PTT TPM 2.0
> This here is my ThinkStation P320 which can choose between PTT 1.2, PTT 2.0,
>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:15:38PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> after some experiments I finally found a solution...
> There seems to be a bug in TPM2.0 firmware version (1.3.1.0) included in
> Lenovos
> UEFI image but they do not provide an update.
>
> I have extracted the
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:15:38PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> after some experiments I finally found a solution...
> There seems to be a bug in TPM2.0 firmware version (1.3.1.0) included in
> Lenovos
> UEFI image but they do not provide an update.
>
> I have extracted the
Hi again,
after some experiments I finally found a solution...
There seems to be a bug in TPM2.0 firmware version (1.3.1.0) included in Lenovos
UEFI image but they do not provide an update.
I have extracted the firmware version 1.3.2.8 from Dell's XPS15 TPM2.0 firmware
update and used this to
Hi again,
after some experiments I finally found a solution...
There seems to be a bug in TPM2.0 firmware version (1.3.1.0) included in Lenovos
UEFI image but they do not provide an update.
I have extracted the firmware version 1.3.2.8 from Dell's XPS15 TPM2.0 firmware
update and used this to
Hi,
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:49 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 03:10:06PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 10:18 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:06:28PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at
Hi,
On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 15:49 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 03:10:06PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 10:18 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:06:28PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 03:10:06PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 10:18 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:06:28PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 03:10:06PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 10:18 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:06:28PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I
On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 10:18 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:06:28PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I tried that patch mentioned by Mimi but it does not change anything for
> > >
On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 10:18 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:06:28PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I tried that patch mentioned by Mimi but it does not change anything for
> > >
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:06:28PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I tried that patch mentioned by Mimi but it does not change anything for me.
> >
> > Then I did some more tests with different kernel configs and
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:06:28PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I tried that patch mentioned by Mimi but it does not change anything for me.
> >
> > Then I did some more tests with different kernel configs and
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried that patch mentioned by Mimi but it does not change anything for me.
>
> Then I did some more tests with different kernel configs and finally got TPM
> working by
> a) compiling TPM as modules and rmmod tpm* and
On Wed, 2018-11-14 at 21:46 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried that patch mentioned by Mimi but it does not change anything for me.
>
> Then I did some more tests with different kernel configs and finally got TPM
> working by
> a) compiling TPM as modules and rmmod tpm* and
Hi all,
I tried that patch mentioned by Mimi but it does not change anything for me.
Then I did some more tests with different kernel configs and finally got TPM
working by
a) compiling TPM as modules and rmmod tpm* and re-modprobe tpm_tis.
(initramfs) dmesg | grep -i tpm
[0.00] efi:
Hi all,
I tried that patch mentioned by Mimi but it does not change anything for me.
Then I did some more tests with different kernel configs and finally got TPM
working by
a) compiling TPM as modules and rmmod tpm* and re-modprobe tpm_tis.
(initramfs) dmesg | grep -i tpm
[0.00] efi:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:11:33PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Very strange... When I pull the power cord, then replug and boot, I get these
> dmesg messages:
> [0.00] efi: ACPI
> 2.0=0x9ea78000 ACPI=0x9ea78000 SMBIOS=0x9f5e5000 SMBIOS
> 3.0=0x9f5e4000 MPS=0xfca00
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:11:33PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Very strange... When I pull the power cord, then replug and boot, I get these
> dmesg messages:
> [0.00] efi: ACPI
> 2.0=0x9ea78000 ACPI=0x9ea78000 SMBIOS=0x9f5e5000 SMBIOS
> 3.0=0x9f5e4000 MPS=0xfca00
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 06:55:36PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis / tpm_i2c_nuvoton
> while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via UEFI setup).
> Kernel version is 4.19.1
Can you check what ACPI dump would show up
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 06:55:36PM +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis / tpm_i2c_nuvoton
> while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via UEFI setup).
> Kernel version is 4.19.1
Can you check what ACPI dump would show up
> Very strange... When I pull the power cord, then replug and boot, I get these
> dmesg messages:
> [0.00] efi: ACPI
> 2.0=0x9ea78000 ACPI=0x9ea78000 SMBIOS=0x9f5e5000 SMBIOS
> 3.0=0x9f5e4000 MPS=0xfca00 ESRT=0x9c06e918 MEMATTR=0x99cb9018
> TPMEventLog=0x
> 98d0c018
> [
> Very strange... When I pull the power cord, then replug and boot, I get these
> dmesg messages:
> [0.00] efi: ACPI
> 2.0=0x9ea78000 ACPI=0x9ea78000 SMBIOS=0x9f5e5000 SMBIOS
> 3.0=0x9f5e4000 MPS=0xfca00 ESRT=0x9c06e918 MEMATTR=0x99cb9018
> TPMEventLog=0x
> 98d0c018
> [
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:34 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 12:29 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:09 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:57 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > > Well, I still think the
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:34 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 12:29 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:09 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:57 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > > Well, I still think the
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 12:29 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:09 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:57 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > Well, I still think the ACPI setup is incorrect. What's in
> > > /sys/class/platform (should be
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 12:29 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:09 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:57 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > Well, I still think the ACPI setup is incorrect. What's in
> > > /sys/class/platform (should be
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:09 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:57 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
[...]
> > Well, I still think the ACPI setup is incorrect. What's in
> > /sys/class/platform (should be directories of ACPI devices)? The
> > TPM is supposed to show up as
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:09 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:57 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
[...]
> > Well, I still think the ACPI setup is incorrect. What's in
> > /sys/class/platform (should be directories of ACPI devices)? The
> > TPM is supposed to show up as
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:57 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:50 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> [...]
> > > However, this makes me wonder about yours:
> > >
> > > > [0.003517] ACPI: TPM2 0x9E490ED8 34 (v03 LENOVO
> > > > TC-
> > > > S06 1300 AMI
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:57 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:50 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> [...]
> > > However, this makes me wonder about yours:
> > >
> > > > [0.003517] ACPI: TPM2 0x9E490ED8 34 (v03 LENOVO
> > > > TC-
> > > > S06 1300 AMI
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:50 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
[...]
> > However, this makes me wonder about yours:
> >
> > > [0.003517] ACPI: TPM2 0x9E490ED8 34 (v03 LENOVO
> > > TC-
> > > S06 1300 AMI )
> >
> > I thought the Lenovo "upgrade to 2.0" in fact disabled
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 19:50 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
[...]
> > However, this makes me wonder about yours:
> >
> > > [0.003517] ACPI: TPM2 0x9E490ED8 34 (v03 LENOVO
> > > TC-
> > > S06 1300 AMI )
> >
> > I thought the Lenovo "upgrade to 2.0" in fact disabled
Hi Mimi,
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:33 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 18:55 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis / tpm_i2c_nuvoton
> > while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via UEFI setup).
> >
Hi Mimi,
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:33 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 18:55 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis / tpm_i2c_nuvoton
> > while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via UEFI setup).
> >
Hi James,
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:24 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 18:55 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis /
> > tpm_i2c_nuvoton while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via
> > UEFI
Hi James,
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 10:24 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 18:55 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis /
> > tpm_i2c_nuvoton while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via
> > UEFI
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 18:55 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis / tpm_i2c_nuvoton
> while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via UEFI setup).
> Kernel version is 4.19.1
>
> Kernel config:
>
> $ cat .config | egrep
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 18:55 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis / tpm_i2c_nuvoton
> while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via UEFI setup).
> Kernel version is 4.19.1
>
> Kernel config:
>
> $ cat .config | egrep
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 18:55 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis /
> tpm_i2c_nuvoton while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via
> UEFI setup). Kernel version is 4.19.1
Not that this helps you, but mine definitely
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 18:55 +0100, Michael Niewöhner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis /
> tpm_i2c_nuvoton while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via
> UEFI setup). Kernel version is 4.19.1
Not that this helps you, but mine definitely
Hi all,
Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis / tpm_i2c_nuvoton
while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via UEFI setup).
Kernel version is 4.19.1
Kernel config:
$ cat .config | egrep 'TCG|TPM|CRB|_TIS'
CONFIG_TCG_TPM=y
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM=y
CONFIG_TCG_TIS_CORE=y
Hi all,
Nuvoton NCPT650 does not work in TPM 2.0 mode with tpm_tis / tpm_i2c_nuvoton
while it works in TPM 1.2 mode (I can reflash it via UEFI setup).
Kernel version is 4.19.1
Kernel config:
$ cat .config | egrep 'TCG|TPM|CRB|_TIS'
CONFIG_TCG_TPM=y
CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM=y
CONFIG_TCG_TIS_CORE=y
45 matches
Mail list logo
