On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
> gurudas pai wrote:
> > Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > >
> > > [PATCH] fix sys_remap_file_pages BUG at highmem.c:15!
> >
> > Yes, indeed this patch worked for me , test completed successfully!! (on
> > preempt kernel). Will continue testing with non-preempt kernel
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
gurudas pai wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
[PATCH] fix sys_remap_file_pages BUG at highmem.c:15!
Yes, indeed this patch worked for me , test completed successfully!! (on
preempt kernel). Will continue testing with non-preempt kernel and update
gurudas pai wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
Nick Piggin wrote:
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
Nick Piggin wrote:
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the backtrace, though.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ouch.
Very much so.
>
> The patch looks obviously correct, to the point that I don't understand
> how this bug happened in the first place. It seems to have been
> introduced by Nick in d0217ac04ca6591841e5665f518e38064f4e65bd ("mm: fault
>
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Very helpful, thanks. Guru, please try the appended patch, I think
> you'll find it fixes it for you (it did for me, once I'd puzzled out
> why I was failing to reproduce the problem - tests on ext3 don't work).
> Thank you so much for reporting this
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
> > > > following messages.
> > >
> > > Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
> > > It's a bit hard to work out from the
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hi,
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the backtrace, though.
Is it possible you can strace to find the arguments for the
On Thursday 04 October 2007 00:53, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thursday 04 October 2007 16:37, gurudas pai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
> > following messages.
>
> Hi,
>
> Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have
On Thursday 04 October 2007 16:37, gurudas pai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
> following messages.
Hi,
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the backtrace, though.
Is it
On Thursday 04 October 2007 16:37, gurudas pai wrote:
Hi,
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hi,
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the backtrace, though.
Is it possible
On Thursday 04 October 2007 00:53, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Thursday 04 October 2007 16:37, gurudas pai wrote:
Hi,
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hi,
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hi,
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the backtrace, though.
Is it possible you can strace to find the arguments for the
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
Nick Piggin wrote:
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the backtrace, though.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Very helpful, thanks. Guru, please try the appended patch, I think
you'll find it fixes it for you (it did for me, once I'd puzzled out
why I was failing to reproduce the problem - tests on ext3 don't work).
Thank you so much for reporting this just
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ouch.
Very much so.
The patch looks obviously correct, to the point that I don't understand
how this bug happened in the first place. It seems to have been
introduced by Nick in d0217ac04ca6591841e5665f518e38064f4e65bd (mm: fault
feedback
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
Nick Piggin wrote:
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the backtrace, though.
gurudas pai wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, gurudas pai wrote:
Nick Piggin wrote:
While running Oracle database test on x86/6GB RAM machine panics with
following messages.
Hmm, seems like something in sys_remap_file_pages might have broken.
It's a bit hard to work out from the
18 matches
Mail list logo
