Problem is no longer present in next-20140321.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Problem is no longer present in next-20140321.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:10:50 -0700 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:06:59 -0700 Tony Luck wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
> > wrote:
> > > Given that this is just an addon patch to Davidlohr's "mm: per-thread
> > > vma caching" patch I
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:06:59 -0700 Tony Luck wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
> wrote:
> > Given that this is just an addon patch to Davidlohr's "mm: per-thread
> > vma caching" patch I was wondering if something in there is architecture
> > specific.
> > But it doesn't
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> Given that this is just an addon patch to Davidlohr's "mm: per-thread
> vma caching" patch I was wondering if something in there is architecture
> specific.
> But it doesn't look like that. So I'm wondering if this only breaks on
> s390?
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:41 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> your patch "mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix-5" in linux-next (see below) breaks
> s390:
>
> [ 10.101173] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:76!
> [ 10.101206] illegal operation: 0001 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
> [ 10.101210]
Hi Andrew,
your patch "mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix-5" in linux-next (see below) breaks
s390:
[ 10.101173] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:76!
[ 10.101206] illegal operation: 0001 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 10.101210] Modules linked in:
[ 10.101212] CPU: 3 PID: 2286 Comm: ifup-eth Not
Hi Andrew,
your patch mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix-5 in linux-next (see below) breaks
s390:
[ 10.101173] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:76!
[ 10.101206] illegal operation: 0001 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 10.101210] Modules linked in:
[ 10.101212] CPU: 3 PID: 2286 Comm: ifup-eth Not
On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 13:41 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
Hi Andrew,
your patch mm-per-thread-vma-caching-fix-5 in linux-next (see below) breaks
s390:
[ 10.101173] kernel BUG at mm/vmacache.c:76!
[ 10.101206] illegal operation: 0001 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[ 10.101210] Modules
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Given that this is just an addon patch to Davidlohr's mm: per-thread
vma caching patch I was wondering if something in there is architecture
specific.
But it doesn't look like that. So I'm wondering if this only
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:06:59 -0700 Tony Luck tony.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Given that this is just an addon patch to Davidlohr's mm: per-thread
vma caching patch I was wondering if something in there is
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:10:50 -0700 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:06:59 -0700 Tony Luck tony.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Heiko Carstens
heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Given that this is just an addon patch
12 matches
Mail list logo
