Hello Weijie,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:48:03PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:26:33PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> >> > Hello Weigie,
> >> >
> >> > On Wed,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Weijie Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:26:33PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>> > Hello Weigie,
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:26:33PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > Hello Weigie,
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:26:33PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hello Weigie,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello Weigie,
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang
>> > wrote:
>> >> I think I find a new issue, for integrity
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello Weigie,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu lliu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:26:33PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello Weigie,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu lliu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:26:33PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello Weigie,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Wed,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:26:33PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello Weigie,
Hello Weijie,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:48:03PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:26:33PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello
Hello Weigie,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang
> > wrote:
> >> I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
> >> to this mail.
> >>
> >> It
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Weijie Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang
>>> wrote:
I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Weijie Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang
>> wrote:
>>> I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
>>> to this mail.
>>>
>>> It is a concurrence issue either,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang wrote:
>> I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
>> to this mail.
>>
>> It is a concurrence issue either, when duplicate store and reclaim
>> concurrentlly.
>>
>> zswap
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang wrote:
> I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
> to this mail.
>
> It is a concurrence issue either, when duplicate store and reclaim
> concurrentlly.
>
> zswap entry x with offset A is already stored in zswap backend.
I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
to this mail.
It is a concurrence issue either, when duplicate store and reclaim
concurrentlly.
zswap entry x with offset A is already stored in zswap backend.
Consider the following scenario:
thread 0: reclaim entry x (get
I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
to this mail.
It is a concurrence issue either, when duplicate store and reclaim
concurrentlly.
zswap entry x with offset A is already stored in zswap backend.
Consider the following scenario:
thread 0: reclaim entry x (get
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
to this mail.
It is a concurrence issue either, when duplicate store and reclaim
concurrentlly.
zswap entry x with offset A is already stored
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu lliu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
to this mail.
It is a concurrence issue either, when duplicate store and
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu lliu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Bob Liu lliu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu lliu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
Hello Weigie,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:33:43PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bob Liu lliu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Weijie Yang weijie.yang...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think I find a new issue, for integrity of this mail thread, I reply
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:30:29PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> 2013/8/19 Minchan Kim :
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> >> Hi Weijie,
> >>
> >> On 08/19/2013 12:14 AM, Weijie Yang wrote:
> >> > I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:30:29PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
2013/8/19 Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
Hi Weijie,
On 08/19/2013 12:14 AM, Weijie Yang wrote:
I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I
2013/8/19 Minchan Kim :
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
>> Hi Weijie,
>>
>> On 08/19/2013 12:14 AM, Weijie Yang wrote:
>> > I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I have
>> > also some questions about it, described as following:
>> >
>> > BUG:
>> >
2013/8/19 Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
Hi Weijie,
On 08/19/2013 12:14 AM, Weijie Yang wrote:
I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I have
also some questions about it, described as following:
BUG:
1.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
> Hi Weijie,
>
> On 08/19/2013 12:14 AM, Weijie Yang wrote:
> > I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I have
> > also some questions about it, described as following:
> >
> > BUG:
> > 1. A race condition when
Hi Weijie,
On 08/19/2013 12:14 AM, Weijie Yang wrote:
> I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I have
> also some questions about it, described as following:
>
> BUG:
> 1. A race condition when reclaim a page
> when a handle alloced from zbud, zbud considers this handle is
I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I have
also some questions about it, described as following:
BUG:
1. A race condition when reclaim a page
when a handle alloced from zbud, zbud considers this handle is used
validly by upper(zswap) and can be a candidate for reclaim.
I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I have
also some questions about it, described as following:
BUG:
1. A race condition when reclaim a page
when a handle alloced from zbud, zbud considers this handle is used
validly by upper(zswap) and can be a candidate for reclaim.
Hi Weijie,
On 08/19/2013 12:14 AM, Weijie Yang wrote:
I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I have
also some questions about it, described as following:
BUG:
1. A race condition when reclaim a page
when a handle alloced from zbud, zbud considers this handle is used
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:17:38AM +0800, Bob Liu wrote:
Hi Weijie,
On 08/19/2013 12:14 AM, Weijie Yang wrote:
I found a few bugs in zswap when I review Linux-3.11-rc5, and I have
also some questions about it, described as following:
BUG:
1. A race condition when reclaim a page
32 matches
Mail list logo