On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock
>> wrote:
>> > On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight
>> >>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From: Markus Rechberger
> >>
>
Markus Rechberger writes:
> Next kernel crash report, this time a Synology NAS System:
> http://support.sundtek.com/index.php/topic,1511.0.html
There is no etxhci_hcd driver in the mainline kernel...
Feb 11 18:50:41 DiskStation kernel: [103740.405521] Backtrace:
Feb 11 18:50:41 DiskStation
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Markus Rechberger
>>
>> Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
>> ERROR
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock hancock...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com
wrote:
From: Markus Rechberger
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd
Markus Rechberger mrechber...@gmail.com writes:
Next kernel crash report, this time a Synology NAS System:
http://support.sundtek.com/index.php/topic,1511.0.html
There is no etxhci_hcd driver in the mainline kernel...
Feb 11 18:50:41 DiskStation kernel: [103740.405521] Backtrace:
Feb 11
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock hancock...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com
wrote:
From: Markus
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 07:29:47PM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Robert Hancock hancock...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at
On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Markus Rechberger
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0: ERROR
Transfer event TRB DMA
ptr
These messages might be harmless. The 3.0 kernel contains a
On 08/02/14 03:00 AM, Markus Rechberger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com wrote:
From: Markus Rechberger
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0: ERROR
Transfer event TRB DMA
ptr
These messages might be harmless. The
The next one, just today (unfortunately it's in German):
http://support.sundtek.com/index.php/topic,1505.msg11020.html#msg11020
This guy is using Ubuntu with Linux 3.13.0-8-generic
The system seems to freeze completely after some time.
Since the driver is using the usbdevfs interface the problem
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Markus Rechberger
>> >> Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
>> >> ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA
>> ptr
>> >
>> > These messages might be harmless. The 3.0 kernel contains a fix for
>> > Intel Panther
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com wrote:
From: Markus Rechberger
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA
ptr
These messages might be harmless. The 3.0 kernel contains a fix for
Intel Panther
The next one, just today (unfortunately it's in German):
http://support.sundtek.com/index.php/topic,1505.msg11020.html#msg11020
This guy is using Ubuntu with Linux 3.13.0-8-generic
The system seems to freeze completely after some time.
Since the driver is using the usbdevfs interface the problem
From: Markus Rechberger
> >> Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0: ERROR
> >> Transfer event TRB DMA
> ptr
> >
> > These messages might be harmless. The 3.0 kernel contains a fix for
> > Intel Panther Point xHCI hosts that suppresses those messages, commit
> >
From: Markus Rechberger
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0: ERROR
Transfer event TRB DMA
ptr
These messages might be harmless. The 3.0 kernel contains a fix for
Intel Panther Point xHCI hosts that suppresses those messages, commit
Hi Sarah,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Sarah Sharp
wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> I'm the xHCI driver maintainer, and it helps to Cc me on USB 3.0 bug
> reports.
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:24:20AM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>> just received following log snippset:
>
> Please state which
Hi Sarah,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Sarah Sharp
sarah.a.sh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Markus,
I'm the xHCI driver maintainer, and it helps to Cc me on USB 3.0 bug
reports.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:24:20AM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
just received following log snippset:
Hi Markus,
I'm the xHCI driver maintainer, and it helps to Cc me on USB 3.0 bug
reports.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:24:20AM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> just received following log snippset:
Please state which kernel version you (or your customer) is running.
You've reported issues with
Hi Markus,
I'm the xHCI driver maintainer, and it helps to Cc me on USB 3.0 bug
reports.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:24:20AM +0100, Markus Rechberger wrote:
just received following log snippset:
Please state which kernel version you (or your customer) is running.
You've reported issues with
just received following log snippset:
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.177695] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.217966] xhci_hcd
Seems like DH87RL was working with 3.2.0-55-generic-pae unfortunately
we don't have such a board for testing and customer patience is
limited to bisect the kernel.
Does anyone have a clue what modification could have killed USB 3.0
support within those releases?
It does not seem to be SG support.
I just got another USB 3.0 bugreport, the entire system crashed. That
particular customer already filed a bugreport in November 2013 that
his system is in a bad state when using some USB 2.0 media devices
which even have opensource drivers built into the kernel.
USB 3.0 support with Linux seems
I just got another USB 3.0 bugreport, the entire system crashed. That
particular customer already filed a bugreport in November 2013 that
his system is in a bad state when using some USB 2.0 media devices
which even have opensource drivers built into the kernel.
USB 3.0 support with Linux seems
Seems like DH87RL was working with 3.2.0-55-generic-pae unfortunately
we don't have such a board for testing and customer patience is
limited to bisect the kernel.
Does anyone have a clue what modification could have killed USB 3.0
support within those releases?
It does not seem to be SG support.
just received following log snippset:
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.118245] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.177695] xhci_hcd :00:14.0:
ERROR Transfer event TRB DMA ptr
Dec 27 23:23:50 solist kernel: [ 36.217966] xhci_hcd
A customer using a device with USBDEVFS is reporting following
backtrace (it seems to be a rather generic issue related to linux usb
3.0 in general):
According to him this problem is reproducible as soon as he starts the
data transfer, is there anything known about that?
He is using
A customer using a device with USBDEVFS is reporting following
backtrace (it seems to be a rather generic issue related to linux usb
3.0 in general):
According to him this problem is reproducible as soon as he starts the
data transfer, is there anything known about that?
He is using
28 matches
Mail list logo
