Luke Browning wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/12/2006 01:04:30 PM:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday 06 December 2006 23:04, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> >
> >No code should ever need to look at other SPUs when performing an
> >operation on a given SPU, so we don't need to hold
Luke Browning wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/12/2006 01:04:30 PM:
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 23:04, Maynard Johnson wrote:
No code should ever need to look at other SPUs when performing an
operation on a given SPU, so we don't need to hold a global
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 23:04, Maynard Johnson wrote:
text(struct spu *spu, struct
spu_context *ctx)
Is this really the right strategy? First, it serializes all spu
context
switching at the node level. Second, it performs 17
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 23:04, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> text(struct spu *spu, struct
> > spu_context *ctx)
> > >
> > > Is this really the right strategy? First, it serializes all spu
> > context
> > > switching at the node level. Second, it performs 17 callouts for
> >
> I could be
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 23:04, Maynard Johnson wrote:
text(struct spu *spu, struct
spu_context *ctx)
Is this really the right strategy? First, it serializes all spu
context
switching at the node level. Second, it performs 17 callouts for
I could be wrong, but I think if
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 01 December 2006 21:01, Maynard Johnson wrote:
+static void notify_spus_active(void)
+{
+ int node;
+ for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node++) {
+ struct spu *spu;
+ mutex_lock(_prio->active_mutex[node]);
+
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 01 December 2006 21:01, Maynard Johnson wrote:
+static void notify_spus_active(void)
+{
+ int node;
+ for (node = 0; node MAX_NUMNODES; node++) {
+ struct spu *spu;
+ mutex_lock(spu_prio-active_mutex[node]);
+
On Friday 01 December 2006 21:01, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> +static void notify_spus_active(void)
> +{
> + int node;
> + for (node = 0; node < MAX_NUMNODES; node++) {
> + struct spu *spu;
> + mutex_lock(_prio->active_mutex[node]);
> +
On Friday 01 December 2006 21:01, Maynard Johnson wrote:
+static void notify_spus_active(void)
+{
+ int node;
+ for (node = 0; node MAX_NUMNODES; node++) {
+ struct spu *spu;
+ mutex_lock(spu_prio-active_mutex[node]);
+
9 matches
Mail list logo