> The current patch set IMO is a little bit hacky. I'm not 100% happy
> with the implicit assumption that there can't be devices supporting
> T1 and classic BaseT modes or fiber modes.
>
> Andrew: Do you have an opinion on that?
Hi Heiner
I would also like cleaner integration. I doubt here is
On 20.08.2019 15:36, Christian Herber wrote:
> On 19.08.2019 21:07, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Caution: EXT Email
>>
>> On 19.08.2019 08:32, Christian Herber wrote:
>>> On 16.08.2019 22:59, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
On 15.08.2019 17:32, Christian Herber wrote:
> This patch adds basic support
On 19.08.2019 21:07, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> On 19.08.2019 08:32, Christian Herber wrote:
>> On 16.08.2019 22:59, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> On 15.08.2019 17:32, Christian Herber wrote:
This patch adds basic support for BASE-T1 PHYs in the framework.
BASE-T1 PHYs
3 matches
Mail list logo