Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] Add BASE-T1 PHY support

2019-08-21 Thread Andrew Lunn
> The current patch set IMO is a little bit hacky. I'm not 100% happy > with the implicit assumption that there can't be devices supporting > T1 and classic BaseT modes or fiber modes. > > Andrew: Do you have an opinion on that? Hi Heiner I would also like cleaner integration. I doubt here is

Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] Add BASE-T1 PHY support

2019-08-21 Thread Heiner Kallweit
On 20.08.2019 15:36, Christian Herber wrote: > On 19.08.2019 21:07, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> Caution: EXT Email >> >> On 19.08.2019 08:32, Christian Herber wrote: >>> On 16.08.2019 22:59, Heiner Kallweit wrote: On 15.08.2019 17:32, Christian Herber wrote: > This patch adds basic support

Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 0/1] Add BASE-T1 PHY support

2019-08-20 Thread Christian Herber
On 19.08.2019 21:07, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > Caution: EXT Email > > On 19.08.2019 08:32, Christian Herber wrote: >> On 16.08.2019 22:59, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>> On 15.08.2019 17:32, Christian Herber wrote: This patch adds basic support for BASE-T1 PHYs in the framework. BASE-T1 PHYs