> Sorry, I find this very confusing.
>
> It seems we have some people telling me that when there's no PHY described
> in DT, we use this link interrupt, and have a functional network interface
> (presumably at whatever speed.)
I give you couple of examples when we have functional network
> Sorry, I find this very confusing.
>
> It seems we have some people telling me that when there's no PHY described
> in DT, we use this link interrupt, and have a functional network interface
> (presumably at whatever speed.)
I give you couple of examples when we have functional network
Russell,
2018-01-03 18:54 GMT+01:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 05:00:47PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
>> > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > Hi Russell,
>> > > >
>> > > > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named
>>
Russell,
2018-01-03 18:54 GMT+01:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 05:00:47PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
>> > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > Hi Russell,
>> > > >
>> > > > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named
>> > > > as 'in- band' to
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 05:00:47PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > Hi Russell,
> > > >
> > > > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named
> > > > as 'in- band' to be on par with the specifications. Anyway - this
> > > > one is rather
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 05:00:47PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > Hi Russell,
> > > >
> > > > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named
> > > > as 'in- band' to be on par with the specifications. Anyway - this
> > > > one is rather
> > > -Original Message-
> > > Hi Russell,
> > >
> > > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named
> > > as 'in- band' to be on par with the specifications. Anyway - this
> > > one is rather a stub for being able to work with ACPI, so once the
> > > MDIO bus works
> > > -Original Message-
> > > Hi Russell,
> > >
> > > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named
> > > as 'in- band' to be on par with the specifications. Anyway - this
> > > one is rather a stub for being able to work with ACPI, so once the
> > > MDIO bus works
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:35:25AM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named as 'in-
> > band' to be on par with the specifications. Anyway - this one is rather a
> > stub for
> >
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:35:25AM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named as 'in-
> > band' to be on par with the specifications. Anyway - this one is rather a
> > stub for
> >
gt;; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kis...@ti.com; Nadav Haklai
> <nad...@marvell.com>; Miquèl Raynal <miquel.ray...@free-electrons.com>;
> Gregory Clément <gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com>; David S. Miller
> <da...@davemloft.net>; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradea
etdev
> ; Antoine Tenart electrons.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; kis...@ti.com; Nadav Haklai
> ; Miquèl Raynal ;
> Gregory Clément ; David S. Miller
> ; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Sebastian
> Hesselbarth
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH net-next 5/6] arm64: dts: marvell:
12 matches
Mail list logo