Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] update ext2 documentation

2001-04-20 Thread Andreas Dilger
Daniel writes: > To quote Oliver Twist: "Please, Sir, I want some more". How about a > explanation of the significance of GOOD_OLD_REV, etc. In particular, I'm > curious why CURRENT_REV is defined as GOOD_OLD_REV and not DYNAMIC_REV. One thing that deserves mentioning (related to your

Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] update ext2 documentation

2001-04-20 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: > The included patch updates Documentation/filesystems/ext2 to reflect > current information about ext2. It also adds some more information > that people have told me is hard to find in other places (such as a > description of the superblock

Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] update ext2 documentation

2001-04-20 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: The included patch updates Documentation/filesystems/ext2 to reflect current information about ext2. It also adds some more information that people have told me is hard to find in other places (such as a description of the superblock compatibility

Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH] update ext2 documentation

2001-04-20 Thread Andreas Dilger
Daniel writes: To quote Oliver Twist: "Please, Sir, I want some more". How about a explanation of the significance of GOOD_OLD_REV, etc. In particular, I'm curious why CURRENT_REV is defined as GOOD_OLD_REV and not DYNAMIC_REV. One thing that deserves mentioning (related to your question)