Re: [Fwd: MMC sub-system: SDIO block-mode with increment address issue]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:37 + Dean Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > My card driver needed to set the R/W E4MI bit in the Card Capability > register (0x08) in CCCR (function 0). Perhaps it is unnecessary ? > That bit is pointless given the current design of the MMC

Re: [Fwd: MMC sub-system: SDIO block-mode with increment address issue]

Hi Pierre, My card driver needed to set the R/W E4MI bit in the Card Capability register (0x08) in CCCR (function 0). Perhaps it is unnecessary ? BTW. It is easy to for the card driver to access function 0 registers by doing the following... ... int old_num = func->num; /* note the

Re: [Fwd: MMC sub-system: SDIO block-mode with increment address issue]

Hi Pierre, My card driver needed to set the R/W E4MI bit in the Card Capability register (0x08) in CCCR (function 0). Perhaps it is unnecessary ? BTW. It is easy to for the card driver to access function 0 registers by doing the following... ... int old_num = func-num; /* note the

Re: [Fwd: MMC sub-system: SDIO block-mode with increment address issue]

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:37 + Dean Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Pierre, My card driver needed to set the R/W E4MI bit in the Card Capability register (0x08) in CCCR (function 0). Perhaps it is unnecessary ? That bit is pointless given the current design of the MMC layer, so it