Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes for 4.14-rc4

2017-10-06 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On rc3 is possible to observe warning about possible circular locking dependency which I've reported on btrfs list few days ago: [ 101.326724] == [ 101.326728] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 101.326734]

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes for 4.14-rc4

2017-10-06 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On rc3 is possible to observe warning about possible circular locking dependency which I've reported on btrfs list few days ago: [ 101.326724] == [ 101.326728] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 101.326734]

[GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes for 4.14-rc4

2017-10-06 Thread David Sterba
Hi, we have two more fixes for bugs introduced in 4.13. The sector_t problem with 32bit architecture and !LBDAF config seems serious but the number of affected deployments is hopefully low. The clashing status bits could lead to a confusing in-memory state of the whole-filesystem operations if

[GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes for 4.14-rc4

2017-10-06 Thread David Sterba
Hi, we have two more fixes for bugs introduced in 4.13. The sector_t problem with 32bit architecture and !LBDAF config seems serious but the number of affected deployments is hopefully low. The clashing status bits could lead to a confusing in-memory state of the whole-filesystem operations if