On 09/02/2015 01:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index fb16a8ea3dee..3c745f3abde8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -3309,13 +3309,13 @@ walk_shadow_page_get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
On 01/09/2015 07:45, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> Actually i triggered this warning in my another box and posted a patch
> to fix it which can be found at:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1508.2/02771.html
> I guess Paolo is currently busy with KVM forum so the patch has not been
> r
On 01/09/2015 02:47, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm:
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> Xiao Guangrong (9):
>> KVM: MMU: fully check zero bits for sptes
>
> The above commit causes an annoying new compiler warning.
>
> The warning is bogus ("variable 'leaf' pos
Linus, I am sorry for the annoyance.
On 09/01/2015 08:47 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Hmm:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Xiao Guangrong (9):
KVM: MMU: fully check zero bits for sptes
The above commit causes an annoying new compiler warning.
The warning is bogu
Hmm:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Xiao Guangrong (9):
> KVM: MMU: fully check zero bits for sptes
The above commit causes an annoying new compiler warning.
The warning is bogus ("variable 'leaf' possibly uninitialized"),
because the use of the variable is prot
Linus,
the merge window will likely coincide with my two-week vacation
across August and September.
Rather than hoping for an -rc8, I'm sending now what I have. The
PPC and ARM parts might come a few days after the official end
of the merge window.
The uncommon name for the tag (you said you lo
6 matches
Mail list logo