Hi David,
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:51:17 + David Howells wrote:
>
> Belay that, please. Fengguang's magic build farm found a couple of issues.
And, clearly, this has been nowhere near linux-next ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
pgplApXcEzC8g.pgp
David Howells wrote:
> Could you pull these updates to the AFS filesystem please? There are two
> sets:
>
> (1) Replacements of rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER().
>
> (2) Usage of 64-bit times on all arches to help deal with the 2038 problem.
Belay that, please. Fengguang's
Hi Linus,
Could you pull these updates to the AFS filesystem please? There are two
sets:
(1) Replacements of rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER().
(2) Usage of 64-bit times on all arches to help deal with the 2038 problem.
Thanks,
David
---
The following changes since commit
Hi David,
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:51:17 + David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Belay that, please. Fengguang's magic build farm found a couple of issues.
And, clearly, this has been nowhere near linux-next ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
Hi Linus,
Could you pull these updates to the AFS filesystem please? There are two
sets:
(1) Replacements of rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER().
(2) Usage of 64-bit times on all arches to help deal with the 2038 problem.
Thanks,
David
---
The following changes since commit
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
Could you pull these updates to the AFS filesystem please? There are two
sets:
(1) Replacements of rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER().
(2) Usage of 64-bit times on all arches to help deal with the 2038 problem.
Belay that, please.
6 matches
Mail list logo