Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Lachlan's description:
This fix is for a problem that has been in XFS since day one.
[XFS] Avoid replaying inode buffer initialisation log items if on-disk
version is newer.
...
Why wasn't this in the commit logs?
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
>
> Lachlan's description:
> This fix is for a problem that has been in XFS since day one.
> [XFS] Avoid replaying inode buffer initialisation log items if on-disk
> version is newer.
...
Why wasn't this in the commit logs? Now it just
Hi Linus,
A problem has been found for the XFS commit
b394e43e995d08821588a22561c6a71a63b4ff27
and it needs to be reverted.
It has the potential for worse corruption than what it is meant to fix.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git
Hi Linus,
A problem has been found for the XFS commit
b394e43e995d08821588a22561c6a71a63b4ff27
and it needs to be reverted.
It has the potential for worse corruption than what it is meant to fix.
Please pull from the for-linus branch:
git pull git://oss.sgi.com:8090/xfs/xfs-2.6.git
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Lachlan's description:
This fix is for a problem that has been in XFS since day one.
[XFS] Avoid replaying inode buffer initialisation log items if on-disk
version is newer.
...
Why wasn't this in the commit logs? Now it just says it
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Tim Shimmin wrote:
Lachlan's description:
This fix is for a problem that has been in XFS since day one.
[XFS] Avoid replaying inode buffer initialisation log items if on-disk
version is newer.
...
Why wasn't this in the commit logs?
6 matches
Mail list logo
