In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Al Boldi writes:
> Erez Zadok wrote:
> > Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
> > all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
> > test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base
Erez Zadok wrote:
> Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
> all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
> test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
> over 24 hours straight to get through all of our
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Al Boldi writes:
> Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
> > three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
> > Unionfs patches. The patches here represent several months of work
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Al Boldi writes:
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
Unionfs patches. The patches here represent several months of work and
Erez Zadok wrote:
Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
over 24 hours straight to get through all of our
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Al Boldi writes:
Erez Zadok wrote:
Al, we have back-ports of the latest Unionfs to 2.6.{22,21,20,19,18,9},
all in http://unionfs.filesystems.org/. Before we release any change, we
test it on all back-ports as well as the latest -rc/-mm code base (takes
over
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
> three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
> Unionfs patches. The patches here represent several months of work and
> testing under various conditions, especially
The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include three
small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are Unionfs
patches. The patches here represent several months of work and testing
under various conditions, especially low-memory, SMP, and preemption
The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include three
small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are Unionfs
patches. The patches here represent several months of work and testing
under various conditions, especially low-memory, SMP, and preemption
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
The following is a series of patches related to Unionfs, which include
three small VFS/fsstack patches and one eCryptfs patch; the rest are
Unionfs patches. The patches here represent several months of work and
testing under various conditions, especially low-memory,
10 matches
Mail list logo
