On 3/25/16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:01:27 -0600 Jeffrey Merkey
> wrote:
>>
>> I went back and checked the code and as it turns out, none of the
>> patches you nak'd are in the current branch, there are different
On 3/25/16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:01:27 -0600 Jeffrey Merkey
> wrote:
>>
>> I went back and checked the code and as it turns out, none of the
>> patches you nak'd are in the current branch, there are different
>> patches there now. There are two patches
Hi Ingo,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:36:21 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> So neither the x86 nor other affected maintainers have acked these changes or
> have
> agreed to merge it - in fact there are outstanding NAKs against this tree,
> which
> were not mentioned in the pull
Hi Jeff,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:01:27 -0600 Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>
> I went back and checked the code and as it turns out, none of the
> patches you nak'd are in the current branch, there are different
> patches there now. There are two patches you ignored that are in
Hi Ingo,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:36:21 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> So neither the x86 nor other affected maintainers have acked these changes or
> have
> agreed to merge it - in fact there are outstanding NAKs against this tree,
> which
> were not mentioned in the pull request.
>
> Here's
Hi Jeff,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 17:01:27 -0600 Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>
> I went back and checked the code and as it turns out, none of the
> patches you nak'd are in the current branch, there are different
> patches there now. There are two patches you ignored that are in it,
> but no record of
On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>>> On 3/25/16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>>> On 3/25/16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon,
On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> On 3/25/16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
Hi Joe,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe
On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> On 3/25/16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
Hi Joe,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/25/16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at
On 3/25/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/25/16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>>> > > The following changes since commit
>>> >
On 3/25/16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> > > The following changes since
On 3/25/16, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> > > The following changes since commit
>> > > b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
>>
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit
> > > b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
> >
* Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit
> > > b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
> > >
> > > Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13
On 3/17/16, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 23:31 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> On 3/16/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> > On 3/15/16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>
On 3/17/16, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 23:31 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> On 3/16/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> > On 3/15/16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 23:31 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/16/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> > On 3/15/16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 23:31 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/16/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> > On 3/15/16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign commits in the kernel tree (so "-S"
> > > >
On 3/15/16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign commits in the kernel tree (so "-S"
>> is not required), just tags. However we always require that anyone who
>> handles a patch adds a
On 3/15/16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign commits in the kernel tree (so "-S"
>> is not required), just tags. However we always require that anyone who
>> handles a patch adds a Signed-off-by line to
On 3/16/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/15/16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign commits in the kernel tree (so "-S"
>>> is not required), just tags. However we
On 3/16/16, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> On 3/15/16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign commits in the kernel tree (so "-S"
>>> is not required), just tags. However we always require that anyone who
>>>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign commits in the kernel tree (so "-S"
> is not required), just tags. However we always require that anyone who
> handles a patch adds a Signed-off-by line to the final commit. See
>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:03:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> We don't generally PGP (GPG) sign commits in the kernel tree (so "-S"
> is not required), just tags. However we always require that anyone who
> handles a patch adds a Signed-off-by line to the final commit. See
>
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0600 Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>
> I was sure I told git to put a sign-off line. Well, I'll go fix that
> and amend the commit as signed. Don't know what happened there. Are
> you supposed to say
>
> git commit -s -a -v -S
>
> I just
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 18:40:37 -0600 Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>
> I was sure I told git to put a sign-off line. Well, I'll go fix that
> and amend the commit as signed. Don't know what happened there. Are
> you supposed to say
>
> git commit -s -a -v -S
>
> I just used
>
> git commit
On 3/14/16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> > The following changes since commit
>> > b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
On 3/14/16, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
>> > The following changes since commit
>> > b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
>> >
>> > Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13 21:28:54
Hi Joe,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> > The following changes since commit b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
> >
> > Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13 21:28:54 -0700)
> >
> > are available in
Hi Joe,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:57:03 -0700 Joe Perches wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> > The following changes since commit b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
> >
> > Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13 21:28:54 -0700)
> >
> > are available in the git
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> The following changes since commit b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
>
> Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13 21:28:54 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> https://github.com/jeffmerkey/linux.git tags/mdb-v4.5-signed
>
>
On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 17:50 -0600, Jeffrey Merkey wrote:
> The following changes since commit b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
>
> Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13 21:28:54 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> https://github.com/jeffmerkey/linux.git tags/mdb-v4.5-signed
>
>
The following changes since commit b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13 21:28:54 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/jeffmerkey/linux.git tags/mdb-v4.5-signed
for you to fetch changes up to 2e9c184e1215dca2b4c59c347f40a0986b8e7460:
The following changes since commit b562e44f507e863c6792946e4e1b1449fbbac85d:
Linux 4.5 (2016-03-13 21:28:54 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/jeffmerkey/linux.git tags/mdb-v4.5-signed
for you to fetch changes up to 2e9c184e1215dca2b4c59c347f40a0986b8e7460:
36 matches
Mail list logo