On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:14:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> I've just tracked down and fixed an bug which can lead to a hard-hang
> in the crtc restore code (which is used both in the lid handler when
> opening and on resume). If you could please test this patch (on top of
> drm-intel-night
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:14:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> I've just tracked down and fixed an bug which can lead to a hard-hang
> in the crtc restore code (which is used both in the lid handler when
> opening and on resume). If you could please test this patch (on top of
> drm-intel-night
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Richard Cochran
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:03:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
>> That patch should crash at all, so this is not expected. Can you pls
>> check whether plain drm-intel-nightly is broken, too?
>
> I did try drm-intel-nightly just now (1dd8
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:03:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> That patch should crash at all, so this is not expected. Can you pls
> check whether plain drm-intel-nightly is broken, too?
I did try drm-intel-nightly just now (1dd83e3), and it also freezes
the machine. I first verified that the
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Richard Cochran
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:07:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> It's written against drm-intel-next-queued at
>>
>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel
>>
>> I've thought that it should apply pretty cleanly against older kern
5 matches
Mail list logo
