On 10/12/2020 17:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 17:09, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 10/12/2020 16:35, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
I'll send out a series addressing irq_to_desc() (ab)use all over the
place shortly. i915 is in there...
Yep we don't need atomic, my bad. And we would
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 17:09, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 10/12/2020 16:35, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> I'll send out a series addressing irq_to_desc() (ab)use all over the
>> place shortly. i915 is in there...
>
> Yep we don't need atomic, my bad. And we would care about the shared
> interrupt
On 10/12/2020 16:35, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 10:45, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 10/12/2020 07:53, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
I think later in the thread there was a suggestion to replace this with
simple counter increment in IRQ handler.
It was indeed unsafe until recent
On Thu, Dec 10 2020 at 10:45, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 10/12/2020 07:53, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>> I think later in the thread there was a suggestion to replace this with
>> simple counter increment in IRQ handler.
>
> It was indeed unsafe until recent b00bccb3f0bb ("drm/i915/pmu: Handle
> PCI
On 10/12/2020 07:53, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
+ Tvrtko and Chris for comments
Code seems to be added in:
commit 0cd4684d6ea9a4ffec33fc19de4dd667bb90d0a5
Author: Tvrtko Ursulin
Date: Tue Nov 21 18:18:50 2017 +
drm/i915/pmu: Add interrupt count metric
I think later in the thread
+ Tvrtko and Chris for comments
Code seems to be added in:
commit 0cd4684d6ea9a4ffec33fc19de4dd667bb90d0a5
Author: Tvrtko Ursulin
Date: Tue Nov 21 18:18:50 2017 +
drm/i915/pmu: Add interrupt count metric
I think later in the thread there was a suggestion to replace this with
simple
6 matches
Mail list logo
