Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-15 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 02:27:41PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > On 9 April 2014 15:08, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Apr 2014, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > >>> On 9 April 2014 11:41, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-14 Thread Daniel J Blueman
On 9 April 2014 15:08, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 09 Apr 2014, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >>> On 9 April 2014 11:41, Dave Airlie wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > On 8 April 2014 15:14, Jani Nikula wr

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-09 Thread Jani Nikula
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >> On 9 April 2014 11:41, Dave Airlie wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: On 8 April 2014 15:14, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2014, Daniel J Blueman

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-08 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > On 9 April 2014 11:41, Dave Airlie wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >>> On 8 April 2014 15:14, Jani Nikula wrote: On Tue, 08 Apr 2014, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > Ville et al, > > It looks

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-08 Thread Daniel J Blueman
On 9 April 2014 11:41, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >> On 8 April 2014 15:14, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Tue, 08 Apr 2014, Daniel J Blueman wrote: Ville et al, It looks like commit e3ea8fa6beaf55fee64bf816f3b8a80ad733b2c2 (or an

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-08 Thread Dave Airlie
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > On 8 April 2014 15:14, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 08 Apr 2014, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >>> Ville et al, >>> >>> It looks like commit e3ea8fa6beaf55fee64bf816f3b8a80ad733b2c2 (or >>> another commit in 3.13.7) broke modes which require D

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-08 Thread Daniel J Blueman
Ville et al, On 8 April 2014 16:02, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >> I am using a dual-link DVI-D to DVI-D cable to this monitor, since I >> previously couldn't get 2560x1440 via HDMI. >> >> If it isn't this commit, then it may be another commit i

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-08 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > I am using a dual-link DVI-D to DVI-D cable to this monitor, since I > previously couldn't get 2560x1440 via HDMI. > > If it isn't this commit, then it may be another commit in 3.13.7, > albeit it feels less likely. Before we go on a wild

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-08 Thread Daniel J Blueman
On 8 April 2014 15:14, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 08 Apr 2014, Daniel J Blueman wrote: >> Ville et al, >> >> It looks like commit e3ea8fa6beaf55fee64bf816f3b8a80ad733b2c2 (or >> another commit in 3.13.7) broke modes which require DVI-D dual-link, >> eg 2560x1440 with my panel. >> >> I don't see

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 DVI resolution regression (3.13.7+)

2014-04-08 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 08 Apr 2014, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > Ville et al, > > It looks like commit e3ea8fa6beaf55fee64bf816f3b8a80ad733b2c2 (or > another commit in 3.13.7) broke modes which require DVI-D dual-link, > eg 2560x1440 with my panel. > > I don't see these modelines in 3.13.7 or later (eg 3.14): > > [