Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Oct 20 (gpu/drm/i915)

On 2016.10.20 21:25:03 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 10/19/16 20:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Changes since 20161019: > >>> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Oct 20 (gpu/drm/i915)

On 2016.10.20 21:25:03 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 10/19/16 20:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Changes since 20161019: > >>> > >> > >> on i386: when CONFIG_ACPI is not

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Oct 20 (gpu/drm/i915)

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 10/19/16 20:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20161019: >>> >> >> on i386: when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled: > > Adding

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Oct 20 (gpu/drm/i915)

On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 10/19/16 20:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Changes since 20161019: >>> >> >> on i386: when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled: > > Adding Zhenyu. Might be good to have a fix just for

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Oct 20 (gpu/drm/i915)

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/19/16 20:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20161019: >> > > on i386: when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled: Adding Zhenyu. Might be good to have a fix just for this that I directly pick up,

Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Oct 20 (gpu/drm/i915)

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 10/19/16 20:20, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Changes since 20161019: >> > > on i386: when CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled: Adding Zhenyu. Might be good to have a fix just for this that I directly pick up, since I want to tag the