Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH] jfs: Expand usercopy whitelist for inline inode data

2018-08-20 Thread Christian Kujau
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Christian Kujau > wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Kees Cook via Jfs-discussion wrote: > >> Bart Massey reported what turned out to be a usercopy whitelist false > >> positive in JFS when symlink contents exceeded 128 bytes.

Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH] jfs: Expand usercopy whitelist for inline inode data

2018-08-20 Thread Christian Kujau
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Christian Kujau > wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Kees Cook via Jfs-discussion wrote: > >> Bart Massey reported what turned out to be a usercopy whitelist false > >> positive in JFS when symlink contents exceeded 128 bytes.

Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH] jfs: Expand usercopy whitelist for inline inode data

2018-08-17 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Kees Cook via Jfs-discussion wrote: >> Bart Massey reported what turned out to be a usercopy whitelist false >> positive in JFS when symlink contents exceeded 128 bytes. The inline >> inode data (i_inline) is actually

Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH] jfs: Expand usercopy whitelist for inline inode data

2018-08-17 Thread Kees Cook
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Kees Cook via Jfs-discussion wrote: >> Bart Massey reported what turned out to be a usercopy whitelist false >> positive in JFS when symlink contents exceeded 128 bytes. The inline >> inode data (i_inline) is actually

Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH] jfs: Expand usercopy whitelist for inline inode data

2018-08-17 Thread Christian Kujau
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Kees Cook via Jfs-discussion wrote: > Bart Massey reported what turned out to be a usercopy whitelist false > positive in JFS when symlink contents exceeded 128 bytes. The inline > inode data (i_inline) is actually designed to overflow into the "extended So, this may be a

Re: [Jfs-discussion] [PATCH] jfs: Expand usercopy whitelist for inline inode data

2018-08-17 Thread Christian Kujau
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018, Kees Cook via Jfs-discussion wrote: > Bart Massey reported what turned out to be a usercopy whitelist false > positive in JFS when symlink contents exceeded 128 bytes. The inline > inode data (i_inline) is actually designed to overflow into the "extended So, this may be a