Re: [KBUILD] Adding vendor drivers...

2000-10-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:01 -0500 (CDT), > Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style > >makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to > >a Config.in, and a

Re: [KBUILD] Adding vendor drivers...

2000-10-03 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:01 -0500 (CDT), Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style >makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to >a Config.in, and a patch which adds the driver to the tree. Jeff,

Re: [KBUILD] Adding vendor drivers...

2000-10-03 Thread Keith Owens
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:01 -0500 (CDT), Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to a Config.in, and a patch which adds the driver to the tree. Jeff, before

Re: [KBUILD] Adding vendor drivers...

2000-10-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Keith Owens wrote: On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:01 -0500 (CDT), Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to a Config.in, and a patch