On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:01 -0500 (CDT),
> Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style
> >makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to
> >a Config.in, and a
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:01 -0500 (CDT),
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style
>makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to
>a Config.in, and a patch which adds the driver to the tree.
Jeff,
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:01 -0500 (CDT),
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style
makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to
a Config.in, and a patch which adds the driver to the tree.
Jeff, before
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Keith Owens wrote:
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 07:11:01 -0500 (CDT),
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, when a vendor has to add a new driver, especially with the new-style
makefiles, you have a one-line patch to a makefile, a one-line patch to
a Config.in, and a patch
4 matches
Mail list logo