On 2014年02月20日 08:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:46:19 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 19/02/14 16:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:32:34 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This patch just do some clean up to
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:46:19 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 19/02/14 16:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:32:34 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >>> This patch just do some clean up to replace printk with pr_*,
> >>> no
On 19/02/14 16:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:32:34 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> This patch just do some clean up to replace printk with pr_*,
>>> no functional change.
>>>
>> Any particular reason for choosing just this file
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:32:34 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > This patch just do some clean up to replace printk with pr_*,
> > no functional change.
> >
> Any particular reason for choosing just this file in this series ?
> It seems but off-topic in
On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> This patch just do some clean up to replace printk with pr_*,
> no functional change.
>
Any particular reason for choosing just this file in this series ?
It seems but off-topic in this series. The printk format is same in almost all
other acpi files and
On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This patch just do some clean up to replace printk with pr_*,
no functional change.
Any particular reason for choosing just this file in this series ?
It seems but off-topic in this series. The printk format is same in almost all
other acpi files and it's
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:32:34 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This patch just do some clean up to replace printk with pr_*,
no functional change.
Any particular reason for choosing just this file in this series ?
It seems but off-topic in this
On 19/02/14 16:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:32:34 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This patch just do some clean up to replace printk with pr_*,
no functional change.
Any particular reason for choosing just this file in this
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:46:19 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 19/02/14 16:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:32:34 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This patch just do some clean up to replace printk with pr_*,
no functional
On 2014年02月20日 08:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:46:19 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 19/02/14 16:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 04:32:34 PM Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 18/02/14 13:55, Hanjun Guo wrote:
This patch just do some clean up to
10 matches
Mail list logo
