On 3/11/21 7:10 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
Hi Guys
On 3/11/21 5:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 3/11/21 3:41 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
On 11.03.21 15:02, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
On 3/11/21 12:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 3/11/21 9:08 AM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
1- Break the
On 3/11/21 12:10 PM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
Hi Guys
On 3/11/21 5:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 3/11/21 3:41 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
On 11.03.21 15:02, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
On 3/11/21 12:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 3/11/21 9:08 AM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
1- Break the
On 3/11/21 3:41 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
On 11.03.21 15:02, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
On 3/11/21 12:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 3/11/21 9:08 AM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
1- Break the current ABI: as soon as those patches are merged,
stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb will impose to use
A tf-a
Hello,
On 11.03.21 16:18, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>> I raised this issue before with your colleagues. I still believe the correct
>> way
>> would be for the TF-A to pass down either a device tree or an overlay with
>> the
>> actual settings in use, e.g.:
>>
>> - Clocks/Resets done via SCMI
Hello,
On 11.03.21 15:02, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> On 3/11/21 12:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 3/11/21 9:08 AM, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
>>> 1- Break the current ABI: as soon as those patches are merged,
>>> stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb will impose to use
>>> A tf-a for scmi clocks. For people using
5 matches
Mail list logo
