On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 03:36:38PM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:00:29AM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > " " == H J Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I got a report which indicates it may not be a good idea,
> > > especially for UDP. Suppose you ha
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 12:00:29AM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > " " == H J Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I got a report which indicates it may not be a good idea,
> > especially for UDP. Suppose you have a lousy LAN or NFS UDP
> > server for whatever reason, some NF
> " " == H J Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I got a report which indicates it may not be a good idea,
> especially for UDP. Suppose you have a lousy LAN or NFS UDP
> server for whatever reason, some NFS/UDP packets may get lost
> very easily while a ping request may get
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:16:36PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>One of the things we've been lacking in the Linux implementation of
> RPC is the 'ping' routine. The latter is used on most *NIX
> implementations in order to test whether or not the RPC server is
> alive. To do so,
4 matches
Mail list logo
