Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v6] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

2017-03-21 Thread SIMRAN SINGHAL
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Alison Schofield wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:36:21AM +0530, simran singhal wrote: > > Hi Simran, > > I going to ask for a v7 without looking at the code ;) > Subject line needs subsystem and driver. > Subject and log message can be

Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v6] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

2017-03-21 Thread SIMRAN SINGHAL
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Alison Schofield wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:36:21AM +0530, simran singhal wrote: > > Hi Simran, > > I going to ask for a v7 without looking at the code ;) > Subject line needs subsystem and driver. > Subject and log message can be improved. > >> The IIO

Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v6] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

2017-03-21 Thread Alison Schofield
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:34:01PM +0530, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Alison Schofield > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:36:21AM +0530, simran singhal wrote: > > > > Hi Simran, > > > > I going to ask for a v7 without looking at the code

Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v6] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

2017-03-21 Thread Alison Schofield
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:34:01PM +0530, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Alison Schofield > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:36:21AM +0530, simran singhal wrote: > > > > Hi Simran, > > > > I going to ask for a v7 without looking at the code ;) > > Subject line

Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v6] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

2017-03-21 Thread SIMRAN SINGHAL
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Alison Schofield wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:36:21AM +0530, simran singhal wrote: > > Hi Simran, > > I going to ask for a v7 without looking at the code ;) > Subject line needs subsystem and driver. > Subject and log message can be

Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v6] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

2017-03-21 Thread SIMRAN SINGHAL
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Alison Schofield wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:36:21AM +0530, simran singhal wrote: > > Hi Simran, > > I going to ask for a v7 without looking at the code ;) > Subject line needs subsystem and driver. > Subject and log message can be improved. Hi Alison, I

Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v6] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

2017-03-21 Thread Alison Schofield
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:36:21AM +0530, simran singhal wrote: Hi Simran, I going to ask for a v7 without looking at the code ;) Subject line needs subsystem and driver. Subject and log message can be improved. > The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by > the IIO core

Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH v6] staging: Use buf_lock instead of mlock and Refactor code

2017-03-21 Thread Alison Schofield
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 01:36:21AM +0530, simran singhal wrote: Hi Simran, I going to ask for a v7 without looking at the code ;) Subject line needs subsystem and driver. Subject and log message can be improved. > The IIO subsystem is redefining iio_dev->mlock to be used by > the IIO core