At 11/15/2012 03:52 AM, Andrew Morton Wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:41:55 +0800
> Wen Congyang wrote:
>
>> At 11/02/2012 05:36 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>
> This doesn't describe why we need the new node state, unfortunately. It
1.
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:41:55 +0800
Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 11/02/2012 05:36 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> >>> This doesn't describe why we need the new node state, unfortunately. It
> >>
> >> 1. Somethimes, we use the node which contains the
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:41:55 +0800
Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
At 11/02/2012 05:36 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
This doesn't describe why we need the new node state, unfortunately. It
1. Somethimes, we use the node which contains the
At 11/15/2012 03:52 AM, Andrew Morton Wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:41:55 +0800
Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
At 11/02/2012 05:36 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
This doesn't describe why we need the new node state, unfortunately. It
1.
At 11/02/2012 05:36 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
>
>>> This doesn't describe why we need the new node state, unfortunately. It
>>
>> 1. Somethimes, we use the node which contains the memory that can be used by
>>kernel.
>> 2. Sometimes, we use the node
At 11/02/2012 05:36 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
This doesn't describe why we need the new node state, unfortunately. It
1. Somethimes, we use the node which contains the memory that can be used by
kernel.
2. Sometimes, we use the node which
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > This doesn't describe why we need the new node state, unfortunately. It
>
> 1. Somethimes, we use the node which contains the memory that can be used by
>kernel.
> 2. Sometimes, we use the node which contains the memory.
>
> In case1, we use
At 11/01/2012 02:16 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
>
>> From: Lai Jiangshan
>>
>> This patch is part3 of the following patchset:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/319
>>
>> Part1 is here:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/30
>>
>> Part2 is here:
At 11/01/2012 02:16 AM, David Rientjes Wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Lai Jiangshan la...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch is part3 of the following patchset:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/319
Part1 is here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/30
Part2 is here:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
This doesn't describe why we need the new node state, unfortunately. It
1. Somethimes, we use the node which contains the memory that can be used by
kernel.
2. Sometimes, we use the node which contains the memory.
In case1, we use
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan
>
> This patch is part3 of the following patchset:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/319
>
> Part1 is here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/30
>
> Part2 is here:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=135166705909544=2
From: Lai Jiangshan
This patch is part3 of the following patchset:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/319
Part1 is here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/30
Part2 is here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=135166705909544=2
You can apply this patchset without the other parts.
we
From: Lai Jiangshan la...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch is part3 of the following patchset:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/319
Part1 is here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/30
Part2 is here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=135166705909544w=2
You can apply this patchset without
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
From: Lai Jiangshan la...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch is part3 of the following patchset:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/319
Part1 is here:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/30
Part2 is here:
14 matches
Mail list logo