On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:46:18AM +, Maciej Rozycki wrote:
> > +#if defined(__BYTE_ORDER__) && __BYTE_ORDER__ != __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
> > +#error "Unsupported endianess, check your toolchain"
>
> Typo here: s/endianess/endianness/.
The original patch has already been merged, please send a
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> b/include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> index 2199adc6a6c2..34a5864526d2 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h
> @@
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:04 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:50:19PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > We did have some bugs in the past (~1-2 y/ago) but AFAIK they are all
> > > fixed now. These days I build most of my kernels with a bi-endian 64-bit
> > > toolchain,
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 01:50:19PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > We did have some bugs in the past (~1-2 y/ago) but AFAIK they are all
> > fixed now. These days I build most of my kernels with a bi-endian 64-bit
> > toolchain, and switching endian without running `make clean` also works.
>
>
From: Michael Ellerman
Date: Mon, May 13, 2019 at 1:33 PM
To: Dmitry Vyukov, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Nick Kossifidis, Christoph Hellwig, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton,
linux-arch, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev
> Dmitry Vyukov writes:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann
> > Date: Sat, May 11, 2019 at
Dmitry Vyukov writes:
> From: Arnd Bergmann
> Date: Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:51 AM
> To: Dmitry Vyukov
> Cc: Nick Kossifidis, Christoph Hellwig, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton,
> linux-arch, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev
>
>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:53 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> > >
>>
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Sat, May 11, 2019 at 2:51 AM
To: Dmitry Vyukov
Cc: Nick Kossifidis, Christoph Hellwig, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton,
linux-arch, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linuxppc-dev
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:53 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > >
> > > I think it's good to have a
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:53 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >
> > I think it's good to have a sanity check in-place for consistency.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This broke our cross-builds from x86. I am using:
>
> $ powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc --version
> powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 7.2.0-7) 7.2.0
>
> and it
From: Nick Kossifidis
Date: Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 6:08 PM
To: Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, linux-arch,
, Linux Kernel Mailing List
> Στις 2019-04-12 17:53, Arnd Bergmann έγραψε:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:36 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>
> >> When
Στις 2019-04-12 17:53, Arnd Bergmann έγραψε:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:36 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
When removing some dead big endian checks in the RISC-V code Nick
suggested that we should have some generic sanity checks. I don't
think
we should have thos inside the RISC-V code, but
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:55 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:36 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >
> > > When removing some dead big endian checks in the RISC-V code Nick
> > > suggested that we should
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:36 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > When removing some dead big endian checks in the RISC-V code Nick
> > suggested that we should have some generic sanity checks. I don't think
> > we should have thos
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:36 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> When removing some dead big endian checks in the RISC-V code Nick
> suggested that we should have some generic sanity checks. I don't think
> we should have thos inside the RISC-V code, but maybe it might make
> sense to have these in
When removing some dead big endian checks in the RISC-V code Nick
suggested that we should have some generic sanity checks. I don't think
we should have thos inside the RISC-V code, but maybe it might make
sense to have these in the generic byteorder headers. Note that these
are UAPI headers and
14 matches
Mail list logo
