(2013/12/03 15:23), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> So do you want me to change to make it simpler without a fetch_param?
>>
>> Yes, yes. Assuming that you agree, of course.
>
> Okay, here goes v8 then. :)
>
> I also push it (with other changes come from Srikar) to the
> uprobe/fetch-v8 branch in my
(2013/12/03 15:23), Namhyung Kim wrote:
So do you want me to change to make it simpler without a fetch_param?
Yes, yes. Assuming that you agree, of course.
Okay, here goes v8 then. :)
I also push it (with other changes come from Srikar) to the
uprobe/fetch-v8 branch in my tree for your
>> So do you want me to change to make it simpler without a fetch_param?
>
> Yes, yes. Assuming that you agree, of course.
Okay, here goes v8 then. :)
I also push it (with other changes come from Srikar) to the
uprobe/fetch-v8 branch in my tree for your convenience. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
>From
So do you want me to change to make it simpler without a fetch_param?
Yes, yes. Assuming that you agree, of course.
Okay, here goes v8 then. :)
I also push it (with other changes come from Srikar) to the
uprobe/fetch-v8 branch in my tree for your convenience. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
From
Hi Namhyung,
On 11/29, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> Hi Oleg,
>
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:31:48 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 11/28, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> >>
> >> I thought we need a fetch_param anyway if we will add support for
> >> cross-fetch later. But I won't insist it strongly, I can delay
Hi Namhyung,
On 11/29, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Oleg,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:31:48 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 11/28, Namhyung Kim wrote:
I thought we need a fetch_param anyway if we will add support for
cross-fetch later. But I won't insist it strongly, I can delay it to
later
Hi Oleg,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:31:48 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/28, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> I thought we need a fetch_param anyway if we will add support for
>> cross-fetch later. But I won't insist it strongly, I can delay it to
>> later work and make current code simpler if you
On 11/28, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> I thought we need a fetch_param anyway if we will add support for
> cross-fetch later. But I won't insist it strongly, I can delay it to
> later work and make current code simpler if you want. :)
OK, great,
> >> static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct
On 11/28, Namhyung Kim wrote:
I thought we need a fetch_param anyway if we will add support for
cross-fetch later. But I won't insist it strongly, I can delay it to
later work and make current code simpler if you want. :)
OK, great,
static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer
Hi Oleg,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 17:31:48 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 11/28, Namhyung Kim wrote:
I thought we need a fetch_param anyway if we will add support for
cross-fetch later. But I won't insist it strongly, I can delay it to
later work and make current code simpler if you want. :)
Hi Oleg,
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:55:46 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hi Namhyung,
>
> I'll certainly try to read (and even apply ;) this series carefully.
Thanks in advance. :)
>
> But let me make a couple of nits right now, even if I do not understand
> this code yet.
Okay.
>
> On 11/27,
Hi Namhyung,
I'll certainly try to read (and even apply ;) this series carefully.
But let me make a couple of nits right now, even if I do not understand
this code yet.
On 11/27, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> + } else if (arg[1] == '+') {
> + struct
Hi Namhyung,
I'll certainly try to read (and even apply ;) this series carefully.
But let me make a couple of nits right now, even if I do not understand
this code yet.
On 11/27, Namhyung Kim wrote:
+ } else if (arg[1] == '+') {
+ struct
Hi Oleg,
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:55:46 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Hi Namhyung,
I'll certainly try to read (and even apply ;) this series carefully.
Thanks in advance. :)
But let me make a couple of nits right now, even if I do not understand
this code yet.
Okay.
On 11/27, Namhyung Kim
From: Namhyung Kim
Enable to fetch data from a file offset. Currently it only supports
fetching from same binary uprobe set. It'll translate the file offset
to a proper virtual address in the process.
The syntax is "@+OFFSET" as it does similar to normal memory fetching
(@ADDR) which does no
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
Enable to fetch data from a file offset. Currently it only supports
fetching from same binary uprobe set. It'll translate the file offset
to a proper virtual address in the process.
The syntax is @+OFFSET as it does similar to normal memory fetching
16 matches
Mail list logo
