Re: [PATCH?] OSS: fix operator precedence in return of btaudio_dsp_ioctl

2007-11-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:59:26PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > Roel Kluin wrote: > > First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained? > > > > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > > What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE > When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25 > Why: obsolete

Re: [PATCH?] OSS: fix operator precedence in return of btaudio_dsp_ioctl

2007-11-29 Thread Tomas Carnecky
Roel Kluin wrote: > First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained? > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25 Why: obsolete OSS drivers Who: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tom - To unsubscribe from this

[PATCH?] OSS: fix operator precedence in return of btaudio_dsp_ioctl

2007-11-29 Thread Roel Kluin
First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained? #define HWBASE_AD (448000) ... with if(bta->analog) evaluating to true bta->decimation may range from 15 to 5 ... HWBASE_AD*4/bta->decimation>>bta->sampleshift which is equivalent to ((HWBASE_AD * 4)/bta->decimation) >> bta->sampleshift actually

[PATCH?] OSS: fix operator precedence in return of btaudio_dsp_ioctl

2007-11-29 Thread Roel Kluin
First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained? #define HWBASE_AD (448000) ... with if(bta-analog) evaluating to true bta-decimation may range from 15 to 5 ... HWBASE_AD*4/bta-decimationbta-sampleshift which is equivalent to ((HWBASE_AD * 4)/bta-decimation) bta-sampleshift actually may

Re: [PATCH?] OSS: fix operator precedence in return of btaudio_dsp_ioctl

2007-11-29 Thread Tomas Carnecky
Roel Kluin wrote: First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained? Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25 Why: obsolete OSS drivers Who: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] tom - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: [PATCH?] OSS: fix operator precedence in return of btaudio_dsp_ioctl

2007-11-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:59:26PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote: Roel Kluin wrote: First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained? Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25 Why: obsolete OSS drivers