On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:59:26PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
> Roel Kluin wrote:
> > First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
> >
>
> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>
> What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE
> When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25
> Why: obsolete
Roel Kluin wrote:
> First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
>
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE
When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25
Why: obsolete OSS drivers
Who: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tom
-
To unsubscribe from this
First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
#define HWBASE_AD (448000)
...
with if(bta->analog) evaluating to true bta->decimation may range
from 15 to 5
...
HWBASE_AD*4/bta->decimation>>bta->sampleshift
which is equivalent to
((HWBASE_AD * 4)/bta->decimation) >> bta->sampleshift
actually
First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
#define HWBASE_AD (448000)
...
with if(bta-analog) evaluating to true bta-decimation may range
from 15 to 5
...
HWBASE_AD*4/bta-decimationbta-sampleshift
which is equivalent to
((HWBASE_AD * 4)/bta-decimation) bta-sampleshift
actually may
Roel Kluin wrote:
First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE
When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25
Why: obsolete OSS drivers
Who: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tom
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 07:59:26PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
Roel Kluin wrote:
First of all, is /sound/oss/* still maintained?
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
What: drivers depending on OSS_OBSOLETE
When: options in 2.6.23, code in 2.6.25
Why: obsolete OSS drivers
6 matches
Mail list logo