Re: [PATCH]: Fix get_compat_sigevent()

On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:37:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:44:09 -0700 "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have no idea how a bug like this lasted so long. > > Probably because very few programs pass sigevents into the kernel ...

Re: [PATCH]: Fix get_compat_sigevent()

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:44:09 -0700 "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have no idea how a bug like this lasted so long. Probably because very few programs pass sigevents into the kernel ... > - memset(, 0, sizeof(*event)); > + memset(event, 0, sizeof(*event)); Blush :-)

Re: [PATCH]: Fix get_compat_sigevent()

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:44:09 -0700 David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea how a bug like this lasted so long. Probably because very few programs pass sigevents into the kernel ... - memset(event, 0, sizeof(*event)); + memset(event, 0, sizeof(*event)); Blush :-) --

Re: [PATCH]: Fix get_compat_sigevent()

On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:37:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:44:09 -0700 David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea how a bug like this lasted so long. Probably because very few programs pass sigevents into the kernel ... Perhaps, but

[PATCH]: Fix get_compat_sigevent()

I have no idea how a bug like this lasted so long. Anyways, obvious memset()'ing of incorrect pointer. Please apply, thanks. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = kernel/compat.c 1.46 vs edited = --- 1.46/kernel/compat.c2005-03-13 15:29:47 -08:00 +++

[PATCH]: Fix get_compat_sigevent()

I have no idea how a bug like this lasted so long. Anyways, obvious memset()'ing of incorrect pointer. Please apply, thanks. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] = kernel/compat.c 1.46 vs edited = --- 1.46/kernel/compat.c2005-03-13 15:29:47 -08:00 +++