Re: [PATCH]: i386: make x86_64 tsc header require i386 rather than vice-versa

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:10:33 -0500 Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86: > rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really > require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions >

Re: [PATCH]: i386: make x86_64 tsc header require i386 rather than vice-versa

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:10:33 -0500 Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86: rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions such as

[PATCH]: i386: make x86_64 tsc header require i386 rather than vice-versa

2007-03-02 Thread Andres Salomon
Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86: rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions such as fedora did not include asm-x86_64 in kernel-devel headers for i386. Ingo's

[PATCH]: i386: make x86_64 tsc header require i386 rather than vice-versa

2007-03-02 Thread Andres Salomon
Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86: rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions such as fedora did not include asm-x86_64 in kernel-devel headers for i386. Ingo's