On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:10:33 -0500 Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86:
> rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really
> require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions
>
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:10:33 -0500 Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86:
rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really
require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions
such as
Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86:
rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really
require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions
such as fedora did not include asm-x86_64 in kernel-devel headers for
i386. Ingo's
Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86:
rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really
require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions
such as fedora did not include asm-x86_64 in kernel-devel headers for
i386. Ingo's
4 matches
Mail list logo