Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:14:29AM +0100, Jan Altenberg wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Your patch looks correct, and seems to be the only obvious chunk > > > that's missing. So, I'll ack it FWIW ... usual policy for these > > > patches is to go through Russell. > > > > You can add my Ack for what it's

Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git

Hi all, > > Your patch looks correct, and seems to be the only obvious chunk > > that's missing. So, I'll ack it FWIW ... usual policy for these > > patches is to go through Russell. > > You can add my Ack for what it's worth. OK, CC'ed Russell and added your Acked-by. Signed-off-by: Jan Alten

Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git

hi, > Which is a combination of two patches, which seems to have dropped the > chunk you show below. The reason this seems to have my signoff is > that I originated one of those patches, and parts of the second, but > in fact I had never seen f230d3f53d72d05bcb5666ab7e2eccd49c8b3a15 > until after

Re: [PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git

On Monday 03 December 2007, Jan Altenberg wrote: > > at91rm9200ek doesn't compile in latest git: > ... > The offending commit is: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6]$ git-bisect good > f230d3f53d72d05bcb5666ab7e2eccd49c8b3a15 is first bad commit > commit f230d3f53d72d05bcb5666ab7e2eccd49c8b3a15 > Au

[PATCH][AT91] Fix compile error for at91rm9200 in latest git

Hi, at91rm9200ek doesn't compile in latest git: /here/workdir/linux-2.6/at91rm9200ek/src/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-ek.c: In function `ek_board_init': /here/workdir/linux-2.6/at91rm9200ek/src/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-ek.c:148: error: `ek_i2c_devices' undeclared (first use in this function) /here/