Pierre Ossman:
First of, I can't really back up the claim that it isn't ok. The SDA has a
paragraph about non-disclosure in their "IP Policy"
(http://www.sdcard.org/membership/images/ippolicy.pdf) but it also states
that exceptions can be granted.
That IP policy covers their members and has no
Russell King wrote:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:23:16PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
I can make a new patch or you can just undo that line once you've
applied the current one.
I'd rather not just apply this patch - there's rather a lot there to
just apply on top of what's already merged.
Is
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:23:16PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> I can make a new patch or you can just undo that line once you've
> applied the current one.
I'd rather not just apply this patch - there's rather a lot there to
just apply on top of what's already merged.
Is there any chance you
Russell King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:22:56PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:22:56PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
> on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
> previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
> It was originally
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:22:56PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was originally diffed
Russell King wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:22:56PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:23:16PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
I can make a new patch or you can just undo that line once you've
applied the current one.
I'd rather not just apply this patch - there's rather a lot there to
just apply on top of what's already merged.
Is there any chance you
Russell King wrote:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 01:23:16PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
I can make a new patch or you can just undo that line once you've
applied the current one.
I'd rather not just apply this patch - there's rather a lot there to
just apply on top of what's already merged.
Is
Pierre Ossman:
First of, I can't really back up the claim that it isn't ok. The SDA has a
paragraph about non-disclosure in their IP Policy
(http://www.sdcard.org/membership/images/ippolicy.pdf) but it also states
that exceptions can be granted.
That IP policy covers their members and has no
Pierre Ossman wrote:
I would if I had some hardware to play with *hint* *hint* ;)
Same here. I have some basic chipset docs.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hi Pierre,
> >lately I got a request for the support of a Bluetooth SD card. These are
> >using SDIO and I think at the moment only memory cards are handled. Do
> >you have any plans for SDIO support?
>
> I would if I had some hardware to play with *hint* *hint* ;)
I don't have one of these
Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Pierre,
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was originally diffed against 2.6.10 but it applies
Hi Pierre,
> Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
> on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
> previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
> It was originally diffed against 2.6.10 but it applies to 2.6.11 just
>
Hi!
> Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been
> sitting on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of
> this previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
> It was originally diffed against 2.6.10 but it applies to 2.6.11 just
> fine
Hi!
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been
sitting on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of
this previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was originally diffed against 2.6.10 but it applies to 2.6.11 just
fine (only
Hi Pierre,
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was originally diffed against 2.6.10 but it applies to 2.6.11 just
fine
Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Pierre,
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was originally diffed against 2.6.10 but it applies
Hi Pierre,
lately I got a request for the support of a Bluetooth SD card. These are
using SDIO and I think at the moment only memory cards are handled. Do
you have any plans for SDIO support?
I would if I had some hardware to play with *hint* *hint* ;)
I don't have one of these cards
Pierre Ossman wrote:
I would if I had some hardware to play with *hint* *hint* ;)
Same here. I have some basic chipset docs.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was originally diffed against 2.6.10 but it applies to 2.6.11 just
fine (only minor
Here are the patches for Secure Digital support that I've been sitting
on for a while. I tried to get some feedback on inclusion of this
previously but since I didn't get any I'll just submit the thing.
It was originally diffed against 2.6.10 but it applies to 2.6.11 just
fine (only minor
22 matches
Mail list logo
