Re: [PATCH][RFC] more initcall cleanups

2001-05-17 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > a) I2C stuff got converted to module_init() nicely. That took > a lot of cruft away. Definitely makes sense. > b) init order is preserved. However, that worked only because > none of the i2c initialization functions touch stuff from

Re: [PATCH][RFC] more initcall cleanups

2001-05-17 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: a) I2C stuff got converted to module_init() nicely. That took a lot of cruft away. Definitely makes sense. b) init order is preserved. However, that worked only because none of the i2c initialization functions touch stuff from random.c

[PATCH][RFC] more initcall cleanups

2001-05-16 Thread Alexander Viro
Linus, I've done a bit more cleaning the device initialization up (beginning of chr_dev_init()) and results were, well, interesting. a) I2C stuff got converted to module_init() nicely. That took a lot of cruft away. b) init order is preserved. However, that worked only

[PATCH][RFC] more initcall cleanups

2001-05-16 Thread Alexander Viro
Linus, I've done a bit more cleaning the device initialization up (beginning of chr_dev_init()) and results were, well, interesting. a) I2C stuff got converted to module_init() nicely. That took a lot of cruft away. b) init order is preserved. However, that worked only