On Wed 2016-08-24 23:27:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (08/24/16 10:19), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > > > > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > > > > + if
On Wed 2016-08-24 23:27:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (08/24/16 10:19), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > > > > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > > > > + if
On Thu 2016-08-25 23:27:40, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-08-24 23:27:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (08/24/16 10:19), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > [..]
> > > > > > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > > > > > + if
On Thu 2016-08-25 23:27:40, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-08-24 23:27:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (08/24/16 10:19), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > > [..]
> > > > > > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > > > > > + if
On (08/24/16 10:19), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > > > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > > > + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > > > +
On (08/24/16 10:19), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > > > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > > > + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > > > +
On Wed 2016-08-24 10:14:20, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > > + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > > +
On Wed 2016-08-24 10:14:20, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > > + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > > +
Hello,
On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > + this_cpu_write(cont_printing, true);
> > +
Hello,
On (08/23/16 13:47), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > + if (system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > + this_cpu_write(cont_printing, true);
> > +
On Tue 2016-08-23 14:18:31, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (08/23/16 00:40), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > RFC and POC
> [..]
> > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > + bool unsafe_pr_cont = preemptible() &&
> > +
On Tue 2016-08-23 14:18:31, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (08/23/16 00:40), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > RFC and POC
> [..]
> > if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> > + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> > + bool unsafe_pr_cont = preemptible() &&
> > +
On (08/23/16 00:40), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> RFC and POC
[..]
> if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> + bool unsafe_pr_cont = preemptible() &&
> + !rcu_preempt_depth();
d'oh, how did it
On (08/23/16 00:40), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> RFC and POC
[..]
> if (!(lflags & LOG_NEWLINE)) {
> + if (!this_cpu_read(cont_printing)) {
> + bool unsafe_pr_cont = preemptible() &&
> + !rcu_preempt_depth();
d'oh, how did it
On (08/22/16 09:10), Joe Perches wrote:
>
> (adding Kay Sievers who wrote most of this)
ok, thanks. then I'll add http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=146717692431893
for more information.
-ss
On (08/22/16 09:10), Joe Perches wrote:
>
> (adding Kay Sievers who wrote most of this)
ok, thanks. then I'll add http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=146717692431893
for more information.
-ss
(adding Kay Sievers who wrote most of this)
On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:40 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> RFC and POC
>
> Petr, I took a very quick look at your series [1]. I think it
> won't work on some of the setups I'm toying with, where multiple CPUs
> can do a
(adding Kay Sievers who wrote most of this)
On Tue, 2016-08-23 at 00:40 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> RFC and POC
>
> Petr, I took a very quick look at your series [1]. I think it
> won't work on some of the setups I'm toying with, where multiple CPUs
> can do a
Hello,
RFC and POC
Petr, I took a very quick look at your series [1]. I think it
won't work on some of the setups I'm toying with, where multiple CPUs
can do a simultaneous pr_cont() output. What do you about the following
approach?
(it's not really tested, I just finished
Hello,
RFC and POC
Petr, I took a very quick look at your series [1]. I think it
won't work on some of the setups I'm toying with, where multiple CPUs
can do a simultaneous pr_cont() output. What do you about the following
approach?
(it's not really tested, I just finished
20 matches
Mail list logo
